Crowell & Moring Launches 'Digital Transformation' Practice to Aid Corporate Innovation
The practice, led by a steering committee of 11 lawyers, focuses on helping in-house attorneys support their company's innovation efforts.
April 27, 2018 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
Law firm Crowell & Moring has announced the launch of a broad “Digital Transformation” practice that looks to serve clients in technology- and innovation-related industries, including privacy and cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and robotics, the Internet of Things, blockchain, drones, and autonomous vehicles.
In addition to external technologists and consultants, the new practice will encompass a cross-disciplinary team led by a steering committee of 11 lawyers from Crowell & Moring's privacy and cybersecurity, regulatory, intellectual property, litigation, and transactional services practices.
Cheryl Falvey, a partner at Crowell & Moring, noted the new practice was launched to better serve the needs of the firm's corporate clients. “It really was in-house lawyers who were critical to making us move in this direction,” she said.
She explained that corporate lawyers “are being required to drive innovation and not slow their business down, so we are working side-by-side with them to help them be a part of the innovation life cycle.”
A large focus of the new collaborative practice will be on “speed to market,” which entails helping corporate clients quickly launch new innovative products or internal processes. “They are under incredible pressure to get those innovations forward before their competitors do, and by sharing knowledge among our practitioners, we can help them see around the corner” to anticipate new opportunities and challenges, Falvey said.
Toward this goal, the practice group will strive to increase clients' awareness of new technologies that can aid their products or operations, and of regulatory trends that may be shaping the technology sector.
As an example, Falvey said, “So perhaps their product is not regulated with regards to interconnectivity, but we see guidance from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or the Food and Drug Administration about medical devices, and we can pull the lessons we are learning from those regulatory initiatives and apply it to a place where a client is not yet regulated.”
The launch of the Digital Transformation practice will not mean the end for the firm's other tech-related practices. “We look at this as completely additive. Our existing privacy and cyber, transactional, and product liability practices are still going to exist,” she noted.
Indeed, the new Digital Transformation practice group was made possible in part because of the firm's recent lawyer expansions. “We've added a number of different lawyers over the past year with this in mind,” Falvey said, adding that the practice group combines “both our existing talent with new lateral talent.”
To be sure, Crowell & Moring is far from the only firm with tech-focused practice areas. Many firms, for example have cybersecurity and privacy groups, while some law firms also focus on emerging technologies such a 3-D printing, autonomous vehicles, and industry specific-technology within existing practice groups as well.
While Falvey noted there are “wonderful law firms in the market that serve” the same industries as Crowell & Moring's Digital Transformation practice, “what makes us distinct is our focus on the full life cycle of technology innovation.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250