As Legal Holds Go International, Legal Tech Adapts
Developing legal hold software to account for a variety of languages can seem like a simple process. But several challenges may arise along the way.
April 30, 2018 at 01:00 PM
4 minute read
One can be forgiven for thinking legal holds only exist in the U.S. It is, after all, a legal responsibility under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and characteristic of the United States' e-discovery culture and tradition.
But U.S.-based multinational companies often have foreign subsidiaries, meaning legal holds can be issued for data stored far from U.S. shores. Managing legal holds in different countries, however, can be a difficult process, not in the least because of language barriers.
Just ask e-discovery and legal hold technology provider Cicayda, whose clients have international offices and legal hold needs beyond U.S. borders. Cicayda recently released an updated 3.0 version of its Fermata legal hold solution, which offers foreign language support for a variety of languages, including Japanese, Chinese, Cyrillic and Spanish.
Before Cicayda could add foreign language functionality to its software, however, it first had to understand how its customers went about managing legal holds at their foreign offices. “It's kind of a complex process,” said Clark Rickman, chief of product development at Cicayda.
The process involves both technology and human manual review. Rickman noted that while clients will often use machine learning software to initially translate text, they will have a native speaker review the translation for accuracy and certain nuances the technology might not pick up, such as idiomatic expressions.
An employee at an overseas office, for instance, will receive a legal hold notification “in the exact same manner—with the questionnaire and attachments—as the custodians would receive it,” Rickman said. “Then they can quality control it, provide changes, and provide approval before it is sent out to, in a lot of cases, hundreds of custodians.”
Where Cicayda's Fermata enters is in uploading and sending out the translated notices to various international offices and employees. The solution, therefore, has to be able to register and display each different language's characters and punctuation.
From a developer's perspective, this isn't as difficult as it may sound. To handle multiple languages, the Fermata database “had to be structured in a manner to handle those characters,” which meant simply updating the database with Unicode scripts, Rickman said.
Unicode, a computing standard for the encoding and representation of text, “gives us support for hundreds of languages,” he added. “And we know because of international standards with the character systems and the work that has already been done in technology that our Unicode support is going to support all those languages.”
Rickman noted that without such Unicode scripts, when trying to process a foreign language, “you basically get gibberish characters.”
Still, onboarding Unicode scripts isn't always a seamless process. Since Western languages rely on similar alphabetic characters, each of which take up one byte of space in a Unicode script, having multiple Western languages within a database may cause some similar files to overlap or replace one another.
“When we made the change, we had millions of records in the software previously, so part of the testing was making sure that we did not adversely affect those single byte records in a manner that was unexpected,” Rickman said.
Developers also had to make sure the software was able to display the distinct syntax and punctuation of certain languages as well. Rickman noted that languages like Thai, Lao, and Arabic don't have breaks at the end of each word, and Arabic in particular is read and written from right to left.
Overall, however, updating the legal hold solution to handle multiple languages did not take Cicayda a long period of time. “We had a pretty rapid development,” Rickman said, explaining that it the whole process took “around six months of development, counting testing.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250