As Legal Holds Go International, Legal Tech Adapts
Developing legal hold software to account for a variety of languages can seem like a simple process. But several challenges may arise along the way.
April 30, 2018 at 01:00 PM
4 minute read
One can be forgiven for thinking legal holds only exist in the U.S. It is, after all, a legal responsibility under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and characteristic of the United States' e-discovery culture and tradition.
But U.S.-based multinational companies often have foreign subsidiaries, meaning legal holds can be issued for data stored far from U.S. shores. Managing legal holds in different countries, however, can be a difficult process, not in the least because of language barriers.
Just ask e-discovery and legal hold technology provider Cicayda, whose clients have international offices and legal hold needs beyond U.S. borders. Cicayda recently released an updated 3.0 version of its Fermata legal hold solution, which offers foreign language support for a variety of languages, including Japanese, Chinese, Cyrillic and Spanish.
Before Cicayda could add foreign language functionality to its software, however, it first had to understand how its customers went about managing legal holds at their foreign offices. “It's kind of a complex process,” said Clark Rickman, chief of product development at Cicayda.
The process involves both technology and human manual review. Rickman noted that while clients will often use machine learning software to initially translate text, they will have a native speaker review the translation for accuracy and certain nuances the technology might not pick up, such as idiomatic expressions.
An employee at an overseas office, for instance, will receive a legal hold notification “in the exact same manner—with the questionnaire and attachments—as the custodians would receive it,” Rickman said. “Then they can quality control it, provide changes, and provide approval before it is sent out to, in a lot of cases, hundreds of custodians.”
Where Cicayda's Fermata enters is in uploading and sending out the translated notices to various international offices and employees. The solution, therefore, has to be able to register and display each different language's characters and punctuation.
From a developer's perspective, this isn't as difficult as it may sound. To handle multiple languages, the Fermata database “had to be structured in a manner to handle those characters,” which meant simply updating the database with Unicode scripts, Rickman said.
Unicode, a computing standard for the encoding and representation of text, “gives us support for hundreds of languages,” he added. “And we know because of international standards with the character systems and the work that has already been done in technology that our Unicode support is going to support all those languages.”
Rickman noted that without such Unicode scripts, when trying to process a foreign language, “you basically get gibberish characters.”
Still, onboarding Unicode scripts isn't always a seamless process. Since Western languages rely on similar alphabetic characters, each of which take up one byte of space in a Unicode script, having multiple Western languages within a database may cause some similar files to overlap or replace one another.
“When we made the change, we had millions of records in the software previously, so part of the testing was making sure that we did not adversely affect those single byte records in a manner that was unexpected,” Rickman said.
Developers also had to make sure the software was able to display the distinct syntax and punctuation of certain languages as well. Rickman noted that languages like Thai, Lao, and Arabic don't have breaks at the end of each word, and Arabic in particular is read and written from right to left.
Overall, however, updating the legal hold solution to handle multiple languages did not take Cicayda a long period of time. “We had a pretty rapid development,” Rickman said, explaining that it the whole process took “around six months of development, counting testing.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250