New Report Shows Progress in Securing Corporate Knowledge Assets
A new report from the Ponemon Institute and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton shows that organizations have deeper understandings and stronger responses to corporate data security.
April 30, 2018 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
In summer 2016, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton and the Ponemon Institute jointly issued a fairly bleak report about the risks to corporate data. The report found that most organizations didn't really understand the threats to their information, much less invest resources in securing it.
Nearly two years and about 100 high profile data breaches later, that landscape seems to be shifting somewhat. A follow-up survey from the two groups found that organizations have made moderate strides in securing their company knowledge assets and responding to breaches when they do occur.
“Generally, what we're seeing is a much-increased awareness and higher recognition that the threats are growing,” Jon Neiditz, co-leader of Kilpatrick's cybersecurity, privacy and data governance practice, told LTN.
The survey polled over 630 security professionals and split findings largely into a general population of organizations and “high performing” organizations. High performers, according to the study, are more likely to restrict employee access to sensitive data, conduct audits of data handling practices, and conduct regular employee cybersecurity training sessions.
“Generally, the high performers are further along the path of digital transformation. They're more aware that their stuff is more valuable to nation-states, and they're generally focusing on certain technologies detailed in the report more than others,” Neiditz elaborated, with those technologies including access management, private user management, access governance and data loss prevention technologies.
Data from the report shows that marginally more organizations, whether high performing or not, now take measures to protect knowledge assets, i.e. internal corporate data beyond just consumer personal identifying information. Boards of directors are increasingly requiring assurances that these assets are safely guarded, especially where third-party vendors are concerned.
Additionally, organizations reported a greater understanding of how little control over their data they truly have. Eighty-two percent of respondents said they were likely to have suffered an undetected breach, up from 74 percent who said the same in 2016. The survey also found that more organizations, 65 percent, believe their valuable knowledge assets lie in the hands of competitors, 5 percent more than the 2016 report.
Neiditz noted that there are still a few areas for organizations to improve. Employee data mishandling is still responsible for a great deal of data breach issues, despite 73 of respondent organizations using employee training programs of some form, and 68 percent conducting comprehension testing.
High performing organizations are more likely to take an additional measure of customizing these trainings to specific employee functions. The report found that 63 percent of high performing organizations tailor their training programs to specific employees, while 51 of all those polled said the same.
Private communications remain a struggle for most organizations and seems to be an area of potential growth. Only 16 percent of organizations report having completely secured their communications, despite 45 percent saying that those communications are among the most valuable organizational knowledge assets. “It's the most difficult to secure, and it is among the most poorly secured,” Neiditz said.
Neiditz noted the survey highlights some of the specific things that organizations have improved upon, details that often get buried when headlines discuss the gravity of cybersecurity concerns and frequency of breaches. “They don't see all the improvement. They don't see how much improvement there is among the overall population,” he said.
The granular data present in the survey, conversely, may help organizations take up and expand upon growth. “Hopefully we can use this survey as a way of providing a road map,” Neiditz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK-Based Legal Entity Management Startup Kuberno Announces £9.5 Million Series A Investment
Legaltech Rundown: Uptime Legal Systems Acquires LexCloud, Spellbook Integrates With Practical Law, and More
3 minute readIn-House Gurus Say Inattention to Human Side of Tech Adoption Can Derail Best-Laid Plans
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250