Casetext Announces AI Search Integration into Revamped Research Tool
Casetext's Case Analysis Research Assistant (CARA) will now be able to analyze any type of legal document to help 'contextual' searches for relevant legal cases .
May 01, 2018 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Legal research technology provider Casetext has announced a major update of its platform that expands the functionality of its Case Analysis Research Assistant (CARA) and updates the product's user-interface and processing speed.
Up until recently, the AI-powered CARA had been mainly deployed as a tool attorneys could “drag and drop” their brief into. CARA would then analyze the brief to find potential missing arguments or case law. But now, “we are integrating our legal research engine with CARA,” said Jake Heller, CEO of Casetext.
“With a drag and drop of a complaint or brief or any document you are working on and the addition of a few simple keywords, you can quickly find the most important cases for your matter,” Heller explained. For example, should a user upload a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York pertaining to fraud at a Brazilian company, the search engine will surface results related to fraud, international companies and that particular district court.
The new search features therefore uses CARA to “contextualize the search experience to the facts, legal issues, jurisdictions and motion issues,” Heller said.
Heller noted the impetus to expand CARA came primarily from client desires to research more efficiently, and the fact that many clients were already using CARA as a stepping stone into broader legal research.
“CARA was originally designed to be a brief check tool, but people would spend seven or 10 hours on it, and that surprised us. They said if I can just drag and drop a brief into CARA, it will find me the more on-point relevant cases to what I am working on, and that is a better place to start for legal research than using traditional tools,” he explained.
To further help clients research more efficiently, Casetext also updated its user interface (UI) to make it “cleaner, crisper, and even simpler to use than in the past,” Heller said. In addition, the company worked on the back end of the platform to make it “dramatically faster and dramatically more responsive,” he added.
Casetext's search expansion and new UI come just months after the company updated its platform to allow users to search through both undisputed law and case summaries and receive case notification alerts. And now trained and fully ready to deploy, the expanded CARA is able to continue learning on its own.
“The system is absolutely getting smarter as people use it,” Heller said, explaining that it recognizes and learns what search entries are most relevant for any particular user. However, “it won't get specifically smarter for one particular brief and train around that one brief; for privacy and security reasons, we don't do that,” Heller added.
Casetext has its fair share of competitors in the legal research field. Bloomberg, LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters, and Westlaw all offer legal research platforms, while Ross Intelligence also recently released a case analysis tool named EVA.
Heller, however, argued that Casetext stands out because it is “now objectively the fastest of all legal research applications.” He added that the update also “cuts through the difficulty of finding primary law authorities and completely changes the paradigm of how you search online for primary source authorities.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250