Casetext Announces AI Search Integration into Revamped Research Tool
Casetext's Case Analysis Research Assistant (CARA) will now be able to analyze any type of legal document to help 'contextual' searches for relevant legal cases .
May 01, 2018 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Legal research technology provider Casetext has announced a major update of its platform that expands the functionality of its Case Analysis Research Assistant (CARA) and updates the product's user-interface and processing speed.
Up until recently, the AI-powered CARA had been mainly deployed as a tool attorneys could “drag and drop” their brief into. CARA would then analyze the brief to find potential missing arguments or case law. But now, “we are integrating our legal research engine with CARA,” said Jake Heller, CEO of Casetext.
“With a drag and drop of a complaint or brief or any document you are working on and the addition of a few simple keywords, you can quickly find the most important cases for your matter,” Heller explained. For example, should a user upload a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York pertaining to fraud at a Brazilian company, the search engine will surface results related to fraud, international companies and that particular district court.
The new search features therefore uses CARA to “contextualize the search experience to the facts, legal issues, jurisdictions and motion issues,” Heller said.
Heller noted the impetus to expand CARA came primarily from client desires to research more efficiently, and the fact that many clients were already using CARA as a stepping stone into broader legal research.
“CARA was originally designed to be a brief check tool, but people would spend seven or 10 hours on it, and that surprised us. They said if I can just drag and drop a brief into CARA, it will find me the more on-point relevant cases to what I am working on, and that is a better place to start for legal research than using traditional tools,” he explained.
To further help clients research more efficiently, Casetext also updated its user interface (UI) to make it “cleaner, crisper, and even simpler to use than in the past,” Heller said. In addition, the company worked on the back end of the platform to make it “dramatically faster and dramatically more responsive,” he added.
Casetext's search expansion and new UI come just months after the company updated its platform to allow users to search through both undisputed law and case summaries and receive case notification alerts. And now trained and fully ready to deploy, the expanded CARA is able to continue learning on its own.
“The system is absolutely getting smarter as people use it,” Heller said, explaining that it recognizes and learns what search entries are most relevant for any particular user. However, “it won't get specifically smarter for one particular brief and train around that one brief; for privacy and security reasons, we don't do that,” Heller added.
Casetext has its fair share of competitors in the legal research field. Bloomberg, LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters, and Westlaw all offer legal research platforms, while Ross Intelligence also recently released a case analysis tool named EVA.
Heller, however, argued that Casetext stands out because it is “now objectively the fastest of all legal research applications.” He added that the update also “cuts through the difficulty of finding primary law authorities and completely changes the paradigm of how you search online for primary source authorities.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250