Take it to the Bank: Legal-Focused Esquire Bank Invests in Litify
The bank put down $2.5 million investment and nearly 5 percent ownership interest in automation and case management technology Litify.
May 03, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Esquire Financial Holdings, holding company for professional and legal services-facing Esquire Bank, this week announced a $2.5 million investment and nearly 5 percent ownership interest in law firm management software Litify. The two companies have executed a marketing and exclusive development agreement to develop automation tools and financial applications for law firms, including a real-time asset-based lending application for commercial law firms.
Esquire Bank CEO and president Andrew Sagliocca explained that Esquire Bank's work with law firms means they have to read a firm's current and existing caseload the way other banks might look at accounts receivable to set financing rates. Small firms tend to keep case information in Microsoft Excel, while slightly larger firms may use database program Access or an internal system to manage cases. “It's a cumbersome process. It's static by nature and it may not be as accurate and complete as you want it to be,” he said.
Litify founder Reuven Moskowitz, who also serves as COO of plaintiff's firm Morgan & Morgan, launched Litify as a way to link Morgan & Morgan's intake and matter operations up to Salesforce, a popular customer relationship management (CRM) platform. Moskowitz and firm co-founder John Morgan launched the system as a stand-alone product in 2016.
Moskowitz and Sagliocca began exploring opportunities for collaborate for the last couple years. Sagliocca said partnering with Litify can give the bank opportunities for technology development that the bank would be unlikely to develop well in-house. “The bank coupling its finance production with technology I would not want to develop, nor could I develop at the bank, seems to be a very smart move,” he said. Banks, Sagliocca added, are “not good at developing technology.”
While law firms are increasingly partnering with technology groups to sell products to financial services groups, the converse is not often true. Moskowitz noted that Esquire Bank and Litify can make their strategy work because of their shared focus on the legal space. “We're both specialized. We're both really focused on this industry together,” he said.
Moskowitz explained that Litify's broad-based approach to legal technology is intentional. “There are a lot of apps out there really focused on single functions—a function to handle intake, a function to handle docs,” he explained. “Because they're disparate, it doesn't allow firms a significant view of what's going on.”
Litify intends to operate as a complete system as a way to bolster transparency to firm leaders. Sagliocca is hoping specifically that the partnership can give firm leaders a better sense of their financial investments.
“The ability for the partners to not just understand their cases but the value in their cases, and what they're investing in those cases in the upfront cost, and understand the efficiency and effectiveness of their firm and their staff and where their value lies, I think is critical,” Sagliocca said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250