New Report Shows GDPR Compliance Is 'More Like a Marathon Than a 100-Yard Dash'
A report from McDermott Will & Emery and the Ponemon Institute finds that GDPR compliance is still a ways off for many organizations.
May 04, 2018 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
A new survey sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery and conducted by the Ponemon Institute found that 40 percent of nearly 1,000 U.S. and European companies polled do not expect to meet General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance requirements by May 25.
Companies have struggled over the last few years to figure out even what GDPR compliance is. Forty-seven percent of those polled said they did not know where to begin their path to compliance.
Despite the high levels of anxiety that companies seem to feel around GDPR preparedness, especially given the regulation's steep fines for noncompliance, McDermott partner Mark Schreiber finds the number of companies who do not believe they will be prepared for GDPR compliance by the deadline “unsurprising.”
“What we're beginning to realize is that May 25 is not a stopping point. It's in some respects just a beginning,” Schreiber said. The race toward GDPR compliance, Schreiber said, “is going to be more like a marathon than a 100-yard dash.”
Although many companies have been making steady progress toward GDPR compliance for the last couple years, Schreiber said some others simply miscalculated the intricacies of the new regulation. “There are a lot of others who didn't quite appreciate the complexity and demands of what GDPR would take,” he noted.
In Schreiber's more than 20 years working in data privacy, the GDPR may be the most complicated regulatory shift he's seen to date. “It has innumerable pieces to it that are just beginning to be understood,” he said.
While Schreiber noted that the May 25 deadline for GDPR compliance is important, companies are increasingly aware that compliance isn't a goal you meet, but an ongoing process. “These obligations are going to go on for years with a number of new adjustments and modulations, further investment and compliance. It's not a one-stop, one-point-in-time obligation,” he said.
The study found that financial services, technology and energy sector companies lead the pack of those who planned to be compliant before the May 25 date, with about 60 percent of companies in each industry reporting likely compliance by the effect date. Companies in less highly regulated spaces, such as retail and manufacturing, were less likely to be compliant by the deadline.
Size also factored into a company's potential GDPR preparedness. Midsized companies, between 5,000 and 75,000 employees, were generally far more confident in their GDPR preparedness than either small companies or large companies.
Schreiber explained that both small and large companies face different kinds of challenges to GDPR preparedness. “If you're very small, you probably don't have the resources,” he noted, adding that large organizations conversely are tasked with trying to cover GDPR compliance across a huge set of different business functions.
For companies of all sizes, however, Schreiber sees a long road ahead for GDPR compliance, far beyond May 25. “It's literally going to create an entirely new regime. It'll have good points, it'll have struggles, but it's really demanding, and I think that's what everyone is learning,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250