Ontario Systems Acquires Justice Systems, Eyeing Comprehensive Court Tech Offering
Under the terms of the acquisition, court case management software provider Justice Systems Inc. will continue operating under its own brand as a separate entity.
May 07, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: bikeriderlondon/Shutterstock.com |
Ontario Systems, a provider of software and technology that helps government, health care and corporate clients recover owed revenue, has announced it has acquired court case management software provider Justice Systems for an undisclosed amount.
Under the terms of the acquisition, Justice Systems Inc. will continue to offer its products and operate under its own brand as an entity under Ontario Systems. The C-suite at Justice Systems, including its co-founder and CEO Ernie Sego, will continue at the helm of the company.
Jay Moorman, vice president of client services at Ontario Systems, noted that his company agreed to acquire Justice Systems after being approached by Sego about the idea. The impetus behind the acquisition, he added, was in large part because Justice Systems' court technology products are complementary to Ontario Systems' own court offerings. “Had that fit not been there from the technology standpoint, we would not have been interested,” Moorman explained.
While Ontario Systems offers local and state courts a revenue collection management and automation product called RevQ, Justice Systems offers case management and processing tools.
When used together, the two companies' offerings can meet all of a court's workflow and management needs, Moorman said. “Justice Systems is on the front end of the court so they are managing cases and processes, and once they get to the point where they need workflow to manage the outcome of those cases, the RevQ product can step in and manage the workflow and collection of money.”
Products from both Ontario Systems and Justice Systems can be both deployed on premise or via the cloud. But since the products serve only local and state clients, and not federal ones, they won't be certificated under the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP). Ontario Systems, however, does provide revenue management offerings specifically for federal clients that are FedRAMP certified.
To be sure, Justice Systems and Ontario Systems are far from the only ones teaming up to serve government clients. The acquisition, for instance, comes just weeks after data governance and e-discovery company Smarsh Inc. and NextRequest Co., a provider of processing software for public records, also announced a partnership to bundle their software solutions for local, state and federal clients.
What's more, other legal technologies are finding success selling their solutions to local and state judiciaries and legal organizations. In early 2017, for instance, Tyler Technologies Inc. entered into a partnership with the State Bar of California to provide the association with access to its case management systems. Two years prior, the company also helped state courts in Texas roll out an electronic court filing system.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250