The Future of Law: How In-House Counsel Will Hire Outside Counsel
Analytics will play a major role in hiring moving forward, forcing many law firms to adjust their strategies.
May 08, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Analytics will define how in house counsel will hire their outside counsel. Just as Facebook mines our personal data to allow advertisers to target us with appropriate ads, companies will require firms who are interested in joining their outside counsel panels to make available all their billing and firm data to measure the firm against their competitors. The data is there to measure a firm's efficiency, responsiveness and success rate.
Consider companies getting access to all of a firm's redacted billing records to evaluate how long it takes for them to prepare for a deposition, a hearing or trial? How long it takes to draft a motion or a research memo? Also, what if companies could access all public records to see how often a firm went to trial and won? How about how often a firm argues discovery motions and wins them? What if that analysis could be done for each lawyer at a given firm?
There are companies already doing this data analysis now. The time will come that if firms want corporations as their clients they will have to turn over reams of data to them and third parties who will mine the data, analyze it, compare it to the data of other firms, give the firm a rating based on the data and make a data driven decision whether to hire the firm, and if so, which attorneys at the firm to hire and handle their matters.
Right now, many clients rely on recommendations from their peers. They're looking for counsel to handle a given matter in a given jurisdiction, and they'll ask their colleagues whom they recommend and why. It's an imperfect and subjective way to choose counsel. The recommendation may be based on incomplete and imperfect information. And if the decision goes south, the in house counsel who hired the outside firm may have to answer to her CEO and the company's board for a runaway verdict.
A data-driven decision, however, is more likely to produce a more scientific result and also provides more cover for the in house counsel pulling the trigger. In case of a runaway verdict, the in house counsel can rely on a stack of data to support her decision. Welcome to data-based CYA.
So what does this mean for law firms? First, efficiency and results matter. Inefficient and ineffective counsel will be identified and forced out of law firms. Firms will take the initiative and start measuring how long it takes their attorneys to complete tasks, assignments, prepare for matters and close out files. They will also measure what their attorneys settle their matters for. These internal analytics will help firms ensure their team is equipped with the best. This exercise will also identify which attorneys are the best at their jobs and those attorneys will be asked to reduce their process to writing and to teach other lawyers at their firms how to be both more effective and more efficient.
This reductionism of the practice will aid less experienced lawyers to better serve their clients. In fact, some firms may reduce this skill set to a reproducible process that, through the assistance of artificial intelligence, may be sold as applications to other firms to help them secure and keep more clients. And why would any firm share its practice secrets? Because the real money to be made by firms in the future is through creating and selling legal technology, not the billable hour.
Getting back to analytics, for this plan to work for companies there has to be (1) data; (2) access to data; and (3) algorithms to evaluate the data. Firms have the data. Many firms will make that data, minus any privileged information, available, in return for being considered as outside counsel. Once a client or a third party has the data, the proper algorithms will flesh out which firms are best suited for their matters. This is all just a matter of time. Welcome to a brave new world of the practice of law.
The Future of Law is a new monthly column by Frank Ramos, the Managing Partner at Clarke Silverglate, a commercial litigation firm in Miami. You can e-mail him at [email protected] or follow him on LinkedIn, where you can download five of his law-related books for free and read his daily practice tips.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250