Logikcull Wants Attorneys to Discover Slack
The company's new Slack feature allows attorneys to search and review communications from the increasingly popular chat tool.
May 09, 2018 at 12:30 PM
3 minute read
Slack app on an iPhone. |
One of the biggest modern challenges of e-discovery, along with keeping up with the vast volume of discoverable data that organizations are now producing, is keeping track of where they're producing it. Communications that were once housed in email now have moved over to chat-based platforms, adding a new layer of complexity for attorneys to tackle.
Self-service e-discovery company Logikcull this week announced that the company would be able to search and review content stored in Slack, a chat-based communications tool popular among technology companies and growing in use among other kinds of enterprises.
Logikcull CEO Andy Wilson said the idea for the feature came from the Logikcull's own use of Slack. Since adopting the platform about four or five years ago, Wilson has noticed that more and more employee conversations take place on Slack, and that inter-office email traffic has slowed pretty substantially.
Attorneys managing e-discovery, however, haven't migrated over to these new systems in quite the same way.
“The more common theme [we heard from attorneys] was 'we have not focused on collecting Slack data' because they don't know how to handle it for discovery. That was shocking to us. They're fearing it because they know a lot of communication is going to Slack, and they know there's good discoverable content there, but they don't have a good way of collecting it,” Wilson said.
Drawing data from Slack isn't quite as easy as email-based discovery. Slack's popularity is due in large part to its ability to quickly link across multiple platforms, meaning Slack threads are often rife with lots of different kinds of content. “It's not a single document with attachments all together, it's a non-document form of information,” Wilson said, adding that re-creating and expanding links to outside content remains one of the biggest challenges of Slack-based e-discovery.
Often, Slack links to internally-permissioned systems, adding another layer of confusion.“That is really, really challenging because you have to have all different levels of access to a business,” Wilson said. Law firms, rather, are more likely to get a basic export, meaning they're likely to miss the content of those permissioned files.
Much like social media, Slack's ability to delete or modify posted content can also create some serious headaches for companies. The new Logikcull feature uses metadata to give attorneys information about any modifications to posted content, allowing attorneys to review any potential content changes.
Although Slack's popularity seems to be rising, Wilson said Logikcull users are still primarily loading in email. Wilson hopes though, given the growing prominence of the platform, that that may change soon.
“Slack is a very unusual form of content for discovery. A lot of people are very confused by it. We're trying to remove that confusion. If you do it this way, extracting this data, processing it, it's just like email,” Wilson said of the company's new Slack feature. “We're trying to make it less scary for them.”
“The thing we want people to do is if you're not asking about Slack data you should,” Wilson later added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250