A Brief History of Blockchain
While many have invested in bitcoin, few really understand the underlying blockchain technology, which could be 'the largest technological expansion since the Internet.'
May 14, 2018 at 08:00 AM
6 minute read
When Bitcoin entered the market in 2009, the value of one bitcoin was $.06 and few noticed. When the price of one bitcoin rose above $19,000 in December 2017, it and its underlying “blockchain” technology became the newest buzzwords and took the world by storm. Just adopting the word “blockchain” seemingly created value. For example, when Long Island Iced Tea, a company that sells beverages, changed its name to Long Blockchain Corp. in 2017, its stock price rose almost 300 percent in one day even though it had yet to actually be involved with blockchain. While many have invested in bitcoin, few really understand the underlying blockchain technology, where it came from, and where it is going.
The Beginning
It is widely believed that the first implementation of modern day blockchain technology came from Satoshi Nakamoto. In 2008, a person or group of people identified as Nakamoto published a paper, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” which hypothesized a direct online payment from one party to another without the use of an intermediary third-party. The paper described “an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust.”
The paper sought to solve the problem of double spending. That is, the very nature of digital currency allows it to be easily duplicated and spent more than once. The resulting uncertainty was fatal to the adoption of the technology. The Nakamoto paper solved this problem by linking every transaction to the transaction preceding it in a tamper-resistant manner. The tamper-resistant manner described by Nakamoto was the public ledger. With this ledger, a network can examine the transaction history of an electronic coin that a user submits for payment, and can confirm that the coin has not already been spent, thereby preventing the “double spending” problem.
Blockchain is a type of database that is duplicated on many computers or “nodes.” All of the nodes have the same information on them. This is vital to the success of the blockchain technology. The information is stored in, as the name implies, blocks. Each block can contain multiple transactions, with each transaction having a unique reference number, a time stamp, a pointer to the immediately previous transaction, as well as information on the transactions themselves. In this way, each node has access to all previous blocks down to the first block of the chain called the “genesis” block. The time stamp gives each block an immutable temporal position in the chain.
A hypothetical transaction exemplifies the way blockchain works. In the context of a sales contract, a seller agrees to sell a widget to a buyer for one “coin.” In a network of computers, one node (buyer) broadcasts code that will automatically deduct one coin from the buyer's account and add it to the seller's account as soon as the seller ships a widget to the buyer. A smart contract is born. That is, the execution part of a contact was reduced to code that is implemented by computers and verified by a community of computers before it is immutably added to the database. As soon as the widget is shipped, the smart contract is executed. The other nodes receive the transaction and turn to verify it by ensuring that the buyer in fact has the coin it has offered to the seller for the widget. The verification may entail looking at the latest transaction of the buyer's account to make sure it holds sufficient funds for the purchase. The sequence of transactions is recorded in an immutable record, i.e., a blockchain, by forcing the nodes in the network to compete in solving a mathematical problem for the right to add the next block of transactions to the chain, linking the winner's new block to the previous block, restarting the competition to add the next block each time a solution is found, and rejecting any attempt to insert or replace blocks earlier in the chain. As such, the buyer cannot spend the coin he has provided to the seller again, as everyone in the system knows the buyer no longer has the asset.
The Evolution
While blockchain initially garnered interest because of its ability to be anonymous, such as in the case with cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, the real appeal of the technology may be due to the complete transparency afforded by it. Indeed, many have found that the underlying blockchain technology has applications in an ever increasing number of applications in nearly every industry.
For example, in 2013, Ethereum introduced blockchain in the form of “a decentralized platform that runs smart contracts.” It explained that blockchain “enables developers to create markets, store registries of debts or promises, move funds in accordance with instructions given long in the past (like a will or a futures contract) and many other things that have not been invented yet, all without a middleman or counterparty risk.” While Bitcoin is simply a currency, Ethereum “is a ledger technology that companies are using to build new programs.” It is one of the first expansions of blockchain technology outside of currency.
The Future
The Economist recently told the story of Mariana Catalina Izaguirre, and how her life might have been different with blockchain technology. She had a home in Honduras and was in possession of the official title to the land; however, the Property Institute had paperwork stating that another person owned the land. A judge signed an eviction order, and by the time Izaguirre proved her case, her home was gone. If Ms. Izaguirre's deed was recorded with blockchain, no one could subsequently claim ownership of her land. Consider also the application to letters of credit. Banks often issue letters of credit to serve as a guarantee for a payment to be made once certain conditions are met. Using blockchain technology, the need for the bank as an intermediary in such a transaction would be removed.
Blockchain technology has evolved and migrated into these fields and continues to grow. It has moved into healthcare, with companies like Hashed Health “leveraging blockchain technologies to solve the most important problems in healthcare.” Blocktix utilizes “Ethereum-based blockchain [to provide] a simple and secure solution to distribute counterfeit-proof event tickets as well as facilitate trustless [peer-to-peer] transfers of ownership.” Follow My Vote is attempting to “build a secure online voting platform that will allow for greater election transparency” using blockchain technology.
Blockchain can become useful in any field that includes transactions, which is to say that blockchain can become useful in every field. And while it may never reach that potential, we could be witnessing the largest technological expansion since the Internet.
Lewis Popovski is a partner at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, where he focuses on intellectual property litigation. George Soussou is an associate at the firm, where he also focuses on intellectual property litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250