Keep Your Keys: Fraud May Be Biggest Threat to Blockchain Technology, Cryptocurrencies
At the CDX Academy Blockchain Brand Innovation Summit in New York, cybersecurity experts and the assistant director of the FTC discussed why fraud is one of the biggest problems facing blockchain-enabled technologies.
May 15, 2018 at 01:28 PM
4 minute read
The promise of blockchain is nowhere more bold than the idea of “sovereign identity solutions,” which use the blockchain to create an immutable record of a person's personally identifiable information which only they can access.
Many see sovereign identity solutions, which are not yet fully developed or deployed, as being a better and more secure alternative to physical paper identification documents. But for others, sovereign identity solutions suffer from the same security pitfall that plague most, if not all, blockchain-enabled technologies, including cryptocurrency: They become fast targets for consumer fraud.
“I think it's interesting, the more control you give more consumers, it's like pushing security to the edge,” said Duane Pozza, assistant director at the Federal Trade Commission, at the CDX Academy Blockchain Brand Innovation Summit in New York on May 11. “In the world of bitcoin, the consumer is basically in charge of securing their own bitcoin if something goes wrong; if they lose their keys or if someone hacks them, they can't get it back. The architecture of many of these systems puts it on the consumer to secure it and take a lot of control over it.”
To be sure, blockchain is an immensely secure technology. Like encryption, it relies on cryptography and public and private keys. Speaking at the summit, Gil Beyda, managing director at Comcast Ventures, explained that while anyone “can encrypt something with that public key, only you can decrypt it with your private key and keep it to yourself.”
Information on the blockchain, therefore, cannot be accessed without a private key because “it is extremely difficult or near impossible to crack that private key,” he said.
But there is an indirect way to get around this near impenetrable security. “If someone gets a hold of your private key, you lose, it's over,” Beyda added.
Pozza, however, noted that the threat of lost keys and fraud could motivate some companies to help store and secure those assets, and “possibly provide some protections around it if something goes wrong. They can build in fraud control” into their blockchain products.
But companies and applications that store blockchain keys might pose their own risk as well. While the blockchain may be secure, “the system that it works on, the application that interacts with it, [and] the protocol that support it are all very vulnerable to attack,” said another summit speaker, Gary Davis, chief consumer security evangelist at McAfee.
Of course, fraud is not just a hypothetical threat in the blockchain market. “With cryptocurrencies, right now there are certainly a lot of reports about fraud, and there have been various actions taken by state and local actors,” Pozza said.
And there are other ways of perpetrating fraud on blockchain-enabled technologies beyond just stealing access. In April 2018, for instance, two founders of a tech company were charged with securities and wire fraud by defrauding investors with a fraudulent initial coin offering (ICO), which involves the selling of tokens for cryptocurrency.
In late 2017, a cryptocurrency trader was also defrauded when another trader spoofed an exchange platform to steal cryptocurrency in an escrow fund. The incident is being litigated in a Delaware court.
Regulators such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are becoming more aware of fraud in the cryptocurrency industry, and are moving to reign in ICOs that do not comply with federal securities regulations. Whether such efforts will help effectively protect cryptocurrency consumers remains to be seen, but at the very least, the dangers facing blockchain-enabled technologies are becoming more apparent as the industry matures.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250