Keep Your Keys: Fraud May Be Biggest Threat to Blockchain Technology, Cryptocurrencies
At the CDX Academy Blockchain Brand Innovation Summit in New York, cybersecurity experts and the assistant director of the FTC discussed why fraud is one of the biggest problems facing blockchain-enabled technologies.
May 15, 2018 at 01:28 PM
4 minute read
Bitcoin Cryptocurrency.
The promise of blockchain is nowhere more bold than the idea of “sovereign identity solutions,” which use the blockchain to create an immutable record of a person's personally identifiable information which only they can access.
Many see sovereign identity solutions, which are not yet fully developed or deployed, as being a better and more secure alternative to physical paper identification documents. But for others, sovereign identity solutions suffer from the same security pitfall that plague most, if not all, blockchain-enabled technologies, including cryptocurrency: They become fast targets for consumer fraud.
“I think it's interesting, the more control you give more consumers, it's like pushing security to the edge,” said Duane Pozza, assistant director at the Federal Trade Commission, at the CDX Academy Blockchain Brand Innovation Summit in New York on May 11. “In the world of bitcoin, the consumer is basically in charge of securing their own bitcoin if something goes wrong; if they lose their keys or if someone hacks them, they can't get it back. The architecture of many of these systems puts it on the consumer to secure it and take a lot of control over it.”
To be sure, blockchain is an immensely secure technology. Like encryption, it relies on cryptography and public and private keys. Speaking at the summit, Gil Beyda, managing director at Comcast Ventures, explained that while anyone “can encrypt something with that public key, only you can decrypt it with your private key and keep it to yourself.”
Information on the blockchain, therefore, cannot be accessed without a private key because “it is extremely difficult or near impossible to crack that private key,” he said.
But there is an indirect way to get around this near impenetrable security. “If someone gets a hold of your private key, you lose, it's over,” Beyda added.
Pozza, however, noted that the threat of lost keys and fraud could motivate some companies to help store and secure those assets, and “possibly provide some protections around it if something goes wrong. They can build in fraud control” into their blockchain products.
But companies and applications that store blockchain keys might pose their own risk as well. While the blockchain may be secure, “the system that it works on, the application that interacts with it, [and] the protocol that support it are all very vulnerable to attack,” said another summit speaker, Gary Davis, chief consumer security evangelist at McAfee.
Of course, fraud is not just a hypothetical threat in the blockchain market. “With cryptocurrencies, right now there are certainly a lot of reports about fraud, and there have been various actions taken by state and local actors,” Pozza said.
And there are other ways of perpetrating fraud on blockchain-enabled technologies beyond just stealing access. In April 2018, for instance, two founders of a tech company were charged with securities and wire fraud by defrauding investors with a fraudulent initial coin offering (ICO), which involves the selling of tokens for cryptocurrency.
In late 2017, a cryptocurrency trader was also defrauded when another trader spoofed an exchange platform to steal cryptocurrency in an escrow fund. The incident is being litigated in a Delaware court.
Regulators such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are becoming more aware of fraud in the cryptocurrency industry, and are moving to reign in ICOs that do not comply with federal securities regulations. Whether such efforts will help effectively protect cryptocurrency consumers remains to be seen, but at the very least, the dangers facing blockchain-enabled technologies are becoming more apparent as the industry matures.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250