85 Percent of Companies Not Fully Ready for the GDPR, Survey Says
The Capgemini report added that 63 percent of U.S. respondents stated they will be largely or completely compliant, with 'a mixed picture across Europe.'
May 21, 2018 at 04:41 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
With the EU's General Data Protection Regulation taking effect later this week, 85 percent of firms in Europe and the United States will not be ready to fully comply on time and one in four will not be fully compliant by the end of this year, according to a recently released report.
The report, “Seizing the GDPR Advantage: From Mandate to High-Value Opportunity,” is from Capgemini's Digital Transformation Institute. France-based Capgemini is a global legal tech consultant.
The report, which came out last week, seems to contradict other recent studies that place compliance figures at a higher level.
Still the company argues that the new law creates new opportunity “for organizations who get it right.”
For example it found 39 percent of consumers have increased their spend with firms that are protecting their personal data.
That conclusion coincides with one from IBM's Institute for Business Value, which recently released a survey that found a majority of companies saw the new law as an opportunity that could help them improve privacy and data security, and serve as a “spark for new data-led business models.”
The Capgemini survey included 1,000 executives and 6,000 consumers across eight countries—the United States plus seven European nations.
With the Friday deadline approaching, the report said 63 percent of U.S. respondents stated they will be largely or completely compliant.
The report said there is “a mixed picture across Europe” however. British businesses are the most advanced, despite only 55 percent reporting they will be largely or completely compliant. Spain at 54 percent, Germany at 51 percent and the Netherlands at 51 percent are close behind. Of the eight countries surveyed, Sweden seems to have the most work to do, with just 33 percent of Swedish firms saying they will be compliant on time.
The research suggests that some companies are overlooking both a possible business opportunity as well as the consequences of noncompliance.
Nearly one-third of firms indicated they are focusing on compliance only, and not looking for a competitive advantage. Although non-compliant organizations face fines of up to 4 percent of annual revenue, nearly 19 percent said ensuring they are prepared is not a priority.
In other key findings, the report said:
- The GDPR is an opportunity waiting to be tapped—individuals are more willing to engage with, and be more loyal to, organizations that protect data. When convinced, individuals have increased spend with an organization by as much as 24 percent.
- But if consumers are unhappy with organizations' GDPR compliance performance, over 70 percent said they are prepared to decrease spend, stop doing business with the organization, and warn their friends.
- To convert the GDPR from mandate to opportunity, organizations must take a series of steps, ranging from educating customers and citizens and winning their trust, to building a culture of respect for personal data within the organization.
“Executives now have a great chance to use GDPR to create a customer-first privacy strategy,” said a statement from Willem de Paepe, global GDPR leader at Capgemini. “Beyond gaining consumer confidence and increased spending, knowing exactly what data is held allows firms to use analytics more effectively and improve operations.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250