The Security Challenges with Bringing Blockchain In-House
Properly securing blockchain-enabled technologies such as smart contracts requires not only traditional cybersecurity protections, but also coordination across multiple different teams.
May 21, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
The promise of blockchain is spurring companies across the economy to experiment with leveraging the technology in their products and internal processes. But given its novelty, bringing blockchain in-house can come with its unique set of security challenges.
Blockchain is digital network of information, complied in a decentralized database shared with users that may have access. Each “block” in a blockchain is a record of information, essentially a entry on a ledger. Companies across the economy, including those in the tech and finance industries have been looking to leverage blockchain for a variety of platforms.
One of the most potentially viable applications is smart contracts, which use blockchain to automatically execute terms, such as transferring funds when a deed is received. But if smart contracts handle sensitive information or funds, users need to make sure that they are coded correctly to ensure the data and capital is managed in the right way.
“Anyone working with smart contracts should absolutely be having an audit done if it's going to handle any kind of operation of importance or financials,” said Yo Sub Kwon, CEO of Hosho, a blockchain security company.
Such audits are necessary, he noted, as “there are so few people writing good contracts right now because the space, the language, the methodology, are so new.”
What's more, if a smart contract manages or transfers cryptocurrency, users also need to take precautions to make sure their digital “wallets”—where cryptocurrency is stored—are safe from cybertheft. “If you're dealing with cryptocurrency, it's very important to have high security measures around the wallet, everything from how the keys are generated to how they are stored, to who has access to backups,” Kwon said.
Beyond cryptocurrency storage and code vulnerabilities, there are operational security issues with using blockchain-enabled technologies as well. Because blockchain, whether public or private, connects multiple different parties, there is a need to ensure security across all users.
With collaboratively using software on the blockchain, whether smart contracts or compliance technology, the problem then becomes one of coordination. “Using peer-to-peer software technologies, you're talking about IT teams and cybersecurity teams having to cooperate with each other across organizations to shield that software from attack and respond to attacks that can occur,” said Amir Azaran, a partner in Loeb & Loeb's advanced media and technology practice.
“So you're going to have to have teams from different organizations working together in a way they haven't had to before, and that's going to be an institutional challenge.”
But it is a challenge that must be overcome. Companies or law firms that use the same blockchain software have to be able to ensure it is not only impenetrable from outside attack, but also restricted only to authorized and trusted in-house users.
“There is absolutely a security issue with who has administrative rights to smart contracts,” Kwon said. “Some of the largest hacks that have happened in the smart contract space have been due to user access or people who have been able to get administrative access when they should otherwise not been able to.”
Indeed, fraud due to unauthorized access of blockchain technologies, such as cryptocurrency wallets, is one of the biggest problems facing the technology. This is mainly because while the blockchain itself is secure, the security of software or transactions on the blockchain are the responsibility of individual users.
For example, “In the world of bitcoin, the consumer is basically in charge of securing their own bitcoin if something goes wrong; if they lose their keys or if someone hacks them, they can't get it back,” said Duane Pozza, assistant director at the Federal Trade Commission, at the CDX Academy Blockchain Brand Innovation Summit in New York on May 11. “The architecture of many of these systems puts it on the consumer to secure it and take a lot of control over it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250