Legal Tech Is the Least Cool Kid in the App Store, Study Finds
A recent study found that only 5 percent of regular mobile users use legal services apps.
May 22, 2018 at 02:16 PM
3 minute read
As the digital world moves more and more into our mobile devices, legal services, true to form, have been slow to move with it. While mobile device users are widely aware of shopping and news apps, a recent report sponsored by LegalShield found that far fewer are searching their mobile app stores for legal services or identity protection service apps.
Although 91 percent of those polled own a smartphone or tablet device, a mere 12 percent of 2,000 polled consumers report use of identity protection apps. Just 5 percent use legal services apps on their mobile devices.
LegalZoom was the most commonly used legal services app, with 46 percent of those who use legal services apps reporting use of it. Forty-four percent of legal services app users use the LegalShield app, 17 percent use Avvo's app, and 11 percent use another legal services app.
The report identified potential room for growth around legal services apps. Sixty-six percent of mobile device owners said that they would be at least somewhat interested in an app that provides essential legal services. Millennials and people with children in the household expressed slightly more interest in these services, with 73 percent and 76 percent of those communities respectively indicating they'd like to see a comprehensive legal services app.
“With technology usage ever on the rise, and no shortage of legal questions and issues, it appears a mobile app that helps with common legal problems would be a welcome addition to the world of apps, embraced most of all by Millennials,” the report concluded.
Representatives at LegalShield could not be reached before press time.
Respondents were most interested some services more than others. Assistance with warranty or insurance claims, creation of a last will and testament, and emergency calls to attorneys ranked highest among potential legal service app users, while adoption services and work-related matters ranked lowest.
Men, according to the report, report a much higher usage of legal services apps than women. Just 2 percent of women polled reported using a legal services app.
Law firms and companies have increasingly looked to consumer-facing mobile app development as a way to drive in business and highlight their commitments to innovation. “Are we going to get clients because of it? I don't know,” Locke Lord chief marketing officer Julie Gilbert previously told The American Lawyer. “But if we make something easier for clients and others, we get name recognition.”
Those concerned with access to justice are also struggling to make legal content mobile-friendly, and to draw mobile users' attention. “Virtually all of these websites were originally created with the notion that people would be accessing them from a desktop [computer],” Legal Services Corporation (LSC) head James Sandman previously told LTN. “Often, they don't translate well to mobile.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Lawyers Waging the Legal Fight Against the Trump Administration
- 2McDermott's Onetime London Leader Headed to Pillsbury
- 3A&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers to EY
- 4Pearl Cohen Enters San Francisco Market Via Combination With IP Boutique
- 5'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250