Wiggin's Legal Tech Startup Eyes Tech Revamp, Global Expansion After Big Pay Day
Wiggin's INCOPRO plans to use a $21 million investment to upgrade its IP technology and expand further into markets in China, the U.S. and Europe.
June 01, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Law is an expanding business, its scope increasingly moving beyond the courtroom and into technology, security consultations and everything in between. An international firm embodying this principle can be found in Wiggin, which in addition to expanding into movie production and on-demand television has extended its reach to the tech space with its intellectual property tech company INCOPRO, which offers users services for online brand and IP protection.
This week, Wiggin announced that its tech startup raised $21 million from investment group Highland Europe. The firm noted that the funds will be used to bolster INCOPRO's tech stock as well as its international footprint, specifically into areas with both lucrative and problematic marketplaces for IP.
Formerly known as Intelligent Content Protection, INCOPRO employs machine learning to scour the web in search of counterfeit products, assesses and prioritizes issues facing a user, and enables the takedown of infringements from the web. INCOPRO CEO and Wiggin IP partner Simon Baggs told Legaltech News that funding will allow the startup to build on its existing machine-learning capabilities, such as filtering counterfeit products from web hits, and create new features, such as tracking offline data for users.
While Wiggin and INCOPRO function as separate entities, Baggs noted the firm uses its technology in “quite a lot of online enforcement work” with companies, as well as film studios.
“The technology that INCOPRO has helps deliver the evidence to support legal cases, so there is quite a close relationship between INCOPRO and Wiggin,” he added. “The more technology that is out there, the more Wiggin can make use of the evidence that's built from that technology to help its clients.”
The relationship also has helped the IP technology company build its own reputation and “a solid customer base,” Baggs noted.
“It's given the company a lot of credibility, so that's enabled it to grow quite fast, which lots of customers want when they look for this kind of service. They like to know the company understands intellectual property, and all the issues that go with that,” he added. “INCOPRO was built out of a law firm; other companies doing this don't have that law firm background.”
Indeed, the firm has been taking steps to leave a greater footprint in the IP space. One of the early law firms in the U.K. to accept equity investments and take on nonlawyer partners, Wiggin acquired 14-lawyer IP boutique firm Redd in 2017. Wiggin CEO John Banister previously told The American Lawyer that Wiggin made the move to build on its then-four-person IP practice, as there had been “lots of client opportunities that we just weren't in a position to take on because our team was too small.” The acquisition, he added, was expected to double its IP practice's revenue to about $8 million over a period of 12 months.
INCOPRO has its eyes on overseas growth as well. Among the post-investment expansions scheduled is in China, where INCOPRO is looking to grow its current operations. The country is widely known for its issues with IP protection. Kroll Associates' Charles Scholz told ABC News that Chinese counterfeits cost foreign firms about $20 million a year in lost profits. A 2016 report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union's Intellectual Property Office found that between 2011 and 2013, roughly 63 percent of fake products across the globe originated in China.
“China is important to us because that's where a large part of the counterfeiting problem comes from. It's estimated that 80 percent of all counterfeit originates in China. So we need people in China dealing with the main online platforms, like Alibaba, WeChat, etc.,” Baggs said.
The company is also planning on strengthening its market presence in Europe, where it plans to open offices in Germany and Italy, and the U.S.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250