Bringing E-Discovery Tech to Contract Analysis, MLA Moves to Contract Advisory Space
Major, Lindsey & Africa's Smart-Look Analytics platform can parse and analyze contracts at a paragraph-level.
June 21, 2018 at 03:01 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock Although e-discovery and contract analysis have a lot of similar elements, rarely are they discussed in the same space. As staffing group Major, Lindsey & Africa (MLA) has moved into the contract advisory space, however, it's found that the two go together increasingly well. MLA's Smart-Look Analytics offering aims to pull technology from the e-discovery world into the contract analysis space. The service uses technology adapted from e-discovery group Planet Data's Exego Select platform to conduct clause-level analysis for M&A and compliance work. The platform can take a set of agreements and produce a “flash report” of a company's risk profile, pointing to things like potential change of control clauses or rebates that can cause problems during due diligence or other M&A exercises. Mark Yacano, global practice leader for MLA's managed legal services team, explained that the technology was designed to showcase the organization's highly skilled staff. “I like to call it a tech-enabled staffing solution, because we didn't want this to be about the technology by itself. We wanted it to be about pairing high-quality experts with technology,” Yacano said. Yacano comes from an e-discovery background, which perhaps enabled him to see the potential application of e-discovery's document parsing technology. When MLA began looking for an appropriate technology partner for this project, Yacano found that technology designed for e-discovery might give reviewers a more granular way to examine document language. Ultimately, Yacano settled on Planet Data's technology to undergird this offering. “When I looked at Exego Select, they'd developed some really unique functionality. It breaks documents apart logically clustered by paragraph,” something, Yacano added, that gives reviewers the ability to “to be able to look at contracts at the clause and paragraph level for things like signability and requirements for signability.” Most document review engines are designed to capitalize on the amount of content present in contracts, using machine learning and other new technologies to suggest potential trouble areas by training algorithms on the data present in the contracts themselves. The Smart-Look Analytics platform, however, is specifically designed to analyze smaller sets of contracts just as effectively as large sets. “We have a deep search algorithm that works just as well with 50 contracts as 50,000 contracts, so we didn't need to have a certain amount of baseline documents to be effective,” Yacano explained. Ultimately, Yacano hopes that the offering, though technology-enabled, is more about helping a smaller group of effective leaders do their jobs with better precision. “It's an alchemy of mixing smaller levels of high-level people who know the area with the right technology,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250