Jill Wiley Wants to Help Independent Firms Grow Up With AI
Wiley, in her upcoming role with business law firm alliance Meritas, plans to launch an international task force on the use of AI.
July 02, 2018 at 11:13 AM
5 minute read
Artificial intelligence has captured a ton of attention from huge global law firms and corporate counsel, but smaller independent firms are still finding their footing in how machine learning and other kinds of predictive coding can aid their work. Tucson, Arizona-based attorney Jill Wiley, the newest chairwoman of the board for global law firm alliance Meritas, is looking to get independent law firms thinking about technology innovation and artificial intelligence. Wiley, also a managing partner at southern Arizona firm Waterfall, Economids, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, has set forth a priority to establish a Meritas international task force on the use of AI. “Using AI innovations effectively in the delivery of legal services across borders will likely differentiate the lawyers who stand out as their clients' trusted business partners from those who cannot adequately serve their clients' needs on a global basis,” Wiley told Legaltech News. LTN spoke with Wiley about her work ahead: LTN: What has been your experience navigating emerging legal technology at your firm? Are there elements of those lessons you plan to bring into your work with Meritas? Wiley: Investing in technology must be very strategic. When making choices about how to utilize and invest in technology, a law firm must deeply consider the impact of long-term trends which may make current investments quickly obsolete. It is a delicate balance between embracing current technology in the short term and remaining nimble to make the necessary adjustments to infrastructure as technology continues to unfold in the long term. I will carry forward this approach to technology in my role as chair[woman] of Meritas. Meritas adds value to its member firms by identifying emerging technologies before firms make any substantial investments. This knowledge, as well as the collective experiences our members have with technology, are shared in a collaborative environment for discussion and to raise the technology IQ of all involved. One of your first projects early on is to establish an international task force on the use of AI. Why do you think it is important to engage about AI on an international level? Going forward, using AI innovations effectively in the delivery of legal services across borders will likely differentiate the lawyers who stand out as their clients' trusted business partners from those who cannot adequately serve their clients' needs on a global basis. As a result of our global membership, many of our member firms are already exploring and utilizing AI in various ways. Meritas is uniquely positioned to be a forerunner on the use of emerging AI technology to help clients solve complex problems globally. What role do you expect AI will play in legal services moving forward? The eventual evolution of AI will not change the fact that clients hire lawyers to help them solve complex problems and to make better strategic decisions. Finding ways to effectively use AI to provide clients with strategic advice will differentiate lawyers in the future. How do you think that member firms can leverage the Meritas network to collaborate on technology strategy? Through the expertise within our network and select outside experts, Meritas has been leading discussions among our membership on how to adapt and exploit AI. While firms themselves may have difficulty staying on the cutting edge of evaluating the impact of all AI technology, our affiliated firms have an advantage of being able to work collaboratively by sharing positive and negative experiences and together exploring innovative ways of using the technology. This will allow Meritas to be a leader in evaluating the application of this technology and other emerging technologies. Meritas recently implemented new cybersecurity guidelines for member firms. How have you seen firms struggle with cybersecurity, and how do you think these guidelines are likely to assist? Clients expect their outside legal counsel to comply with industry standard data protection practices. For individual firms, navigating all of the various aspects of cybersecurity from a global standpoint can be a daunting task. Meritas has taken action to assist our firms in this process and established 10 cybersecurity standards for which all firms must comply. In addition, we have also created best practices and compliance resources to help our member firms understand and meet the minimum cybersecurity standards. How do you plan to keep these guidelines up to date with the needs of the cybersecurity landscape? In this ever-changing cybersecurity landscape, we are working closely with industry experts to ensure we comply with current requirements. Our 10 standards and the resource materials we provide our member firms are reviewed regularly to make certain we are providing accurate guidance to our members, and also to give clients confidence that their experience, from a cybersecurity standpoint, is consistent across all Meritas firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250