NYC Council Puts New Regulations on Ridesharing, With One-Year Vehicle Freeze
The New York City Council has approved a package of bills to regulate Uber and other ridesharing services, including a first-of-its-kind, one-year freeze on the number of vehicles allowed on the city streets.
August 09, 2018 at 01:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The New York City Council has approved a package of bills to regulate Uber and other ridesharing services, including a first-of-its-kind, one-year freeze on the number of vehicles allowed on the city streets.
Weathering a public relations offensive by ridesharing services in opposition to the vehicle cap, which was a factor in a failed attempt in 2015 by city leaders to rein in the fast-growing industry, the council approved the bill to impose the cap with 39 votes in favor and six votes against.
The vehicle cap bill, which proved to be the most contentious piece of legislation in the package in terms of how council members voted, includes an exemption for wheelchair-accessible vehicles, of which there is a relatively low percentage among app-based vehicle fleets in the city.
The legislation also contains a bill to implement minimum pay for drivers. The bills now go to Mayor Bill de Blasio, who has expressed support for the legislation, for his signature.
The bills were the product of months of negotiations and meetings by a Committee on For-Hire Vehicles, which was formed at the beginning of the year to consider regulations on the industry.
While the 2015 effort to regulate the rideshare services, classified as for-hire vehicles, was unsuccessful, in the years since, increasing congestion on the city streets and a rash of recent driver suicides that were linked to the falling value of taxi medallions motivated city leaders to take a more aggressive approach to the industry.
Councilman Brad Lander, who represents the Park Slope section of Brooklyn and who serves on the FHV committee, said at a meeting of the committee on Wednesday morning that, while app-based service has been a game-changer for New Yorkers, particularly those in the outer boroughs where taxi service is scarce, the package of bills “gets the balance right.”
“We are confronting plummeting driver pay and rising driver poverty, growing congestion, the need for wheelchair-accessible FHV service for thousands of New Yorkers, with the need to provide good service to customers and we don't take that for granted,” Lander said.
There were about 74,000 for-hire vehicle licenses issued in 2014—which includes app-based services as well as livery cabs—and that number has grown to about 130,000 today, said Councilman Stephen Levin, who represents neighborhoods in downtown Brooklyn and surrounding areas and who sponsored one of the bills, during the meeting.
Among those who voted against the bill were Councilman Eric Ulrich, a Republican who represents neighborhoods in southeastern Queens, who called yellow cabs a “declining industry with an outdated business model” and who likened placing a cap on the number of for-hire vehicle on city streets to placing a cap on “Netflix subscriptions because we're worried about Blockbusters closing.”
“This is a free market and we have to be able to move with the market,” Ulrich said.
As for the ridesharing services themselves, Uber and Lyft issued statements following the council's vote denouncing the council's legislation, reiterating its criticisms that a vehicle cap will have disproportionately negative effects for residents of the city's outer boroughs, where both taxi and subway service tends to be relatively skeletal.
“These sweeping cuts to transportation will bring New Yorkers back to an era of struggling to get a ride, particularly for communities of color and in the outer boroughs,” said Joseph Okpaku, vice president of public policy for Lyft. “We will never stop working to ensure New Yorkers have access to reliable and affordable transportation in every borough.”
Danielle Filson, a spokeswoman for Uber, said the freeze on vehicles will “threaten one of the few reliable transportation options” in the city while doing nothing to alleviate congestion in the city or fix the subways, which have drawn New Yorkers' ire in recent years as service has diminished and delays have increased.
Filson said that Uber takes Council Speaker Corey Johnson “at his word that the pause is not intended to reduce service for New Yorkers and we trust that he will hold the TLC accountable, ensuring that no New Yorker is left stranded,” she said. “In the meantime, Uber will do whatever it takes to keep up with growing demand and we will not stop working with city and state leaders, including Speaker Johnson, to pass real solutions like comprehensive congestion pricing.”
But both companies have said they support lifting drivers' wages as well as placing a surcharge on vehicles moving through certain portions of Manhattan during peak traffic hours, known as congestion pricing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250