NYC Council Puts New Regulations on Ridesharing, With One-Year Vehicle Freeze
The New York City Council has approved a package of bills to regulate Uber and other ridesharing services, including a first-of-its-kind, one-year freeze on the number of vehicles allowed on the city streets.
August 09, 2018 at 01:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The New York City Council has approved a package of bills to regulate Uber and other ridesharing services, including a first-of-its-kind, one-year freeze on the number of vehicles allowed on the city streets.
Weathering a public relations offensive by ridesharing services in opposition to the vehicle cap, which was a factor in a failed attempt in 2015 by city leaders to rein in the fast-growing industry, the council approved the bill to impose the cap with 39 votes in favor and six votes against.
The vehicle cap bill, which proved to be the most contentious piece of legislation in the package in terms of how council members voted, includes an exemption for wheelchair-accessible vehicles, of which there is a relatively low percentage among app-based vehicle fleets in the city.
The legislation also contains a bill to implement minimum pay for drivers. The bills now go to Mayor Bill de Blasio, who has expressed support for the legislation, for his signature.
The bills were the product of months of negotiations and meetings by a Committee on For-Hire Vehicles, which was formed at the beginning of the year to consider regulations on the industry.
While the 2015 effort to regulate the rideshare services, classified as for-hire vehicles, was unsuccessful, in the years since, increasing congestion on the city streets and a rash of recent driver suicides that were linked to the falling value of taxi medallions motivated city leaders to take a more aggressive approach to the industry.
Councilman Brad Lander, who represents the Park Slope section of Brooklyn and who serves on the FHV committee, said at a meeting of the committee on Wednesday morning that, while app-based service has been a game-changer for New Yorkers, particularly those in the outer boroughs where taxi service is scarce, the package of bills “gets the balance right.”
“We are confronting plummeting driver pay and rising driver poverty, growing congestion, the need for wheelchair-accessible FHV service for thousands of New Yorkers, with the need to provide good service to customers and we don't take that for granted,” Lander said.
There were about 74,000 for-hire vehicle licenses issued in 2014—which includes app-based services as well as livery cabs—and that number has grown to about 130,000 today, said Councilman Stephen Levin, who represents neighborhoods in downtown Brooklyn and surrounding areas and who sponsored one of the bills, during the meeting.
Among those who voted against the bill were Councilman Eric Ulrich, a Republican who represents neighborhoods in southeastern Queens, who called yellow cabs a “declining industry with an outdated business model” and who likened placing a cap on the number of for-hire vehicle on city streets to placing a cap on “Netflix subscriptions because we're worried about Blockbusters closing.”
“This is a free market and we have to be able to move with the market,” Ulrich said.
As for the ridesharing services themselves, Uber and Lyft issued statements following the council's vote denouncing the council's legislation, reiterating its criticisms that a vehicle cap will have disproportionately negative effects for residents of the city's outer boroughs, where both taxi and subway service tends to be relatively skeletal.
“These sweeping cuts to transportation will bring New Yorkers back to an era of struggling to get a ride, particularly for communities of color and in the outer boroughs,” said Joseph Okpaku, vice president of public policy for Lyft. “We will never stop working to ensure New Yorkers have access to reliable and affordable transportation in every borough.”
Danielle Filson, a spokeswoman for Uber, said the freeze on vehicles will “threaten one of the few reliable transportation options” in the city while doing nothing to alleviate congestion in the city or fix the subways, which have drawn New Yorkers' ire in recent years as service has diminished and delays have increased.
Filson said that Uber takes Council Speaker Corey Johnson “at his word that the pause is not intended to reduce service for New Yorkers and we trust that he will hold the TLC accountable, ensuring that no New Yorker is left stranded,” she said. “In the meantime, Uber will do whatever it takes to keep up with growing demand and we will not stop working with city and state leaders, including Speaker Johnson, to pass real solutions like comprehensive congestion pricing.”
But both companies have said they support lifting drivers' wages as well as placing a surcharge on vehicles moving through certain portions of Manhattan during peak traffic hours, known as congestion pricing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250