New Startup Wants to Secure Smart Contracts, Closes $1.25M in Funding
Sagewise looks to offer a set of tools to fix security holes in smart contracts and resolve disputes stemming from unauthorized executions of such contracts.
August 15, 2018 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
The promise of smart contracts, which automatically execute their terms on the blockchain without need of intermediaries, has caught the eye of many in the legal tech industry. But before such contracts can go mainstream, they have to fix a glaring problem: security lapses being easily exploited by cybercriminals.
Some investors, however, believe a recent legal tech startup has the answer. Sagewise, which markets itself as a “safety net for smart contracts,” recently closed on a $1.25 million funding round led by Wavemaker Genesis.
The startup was founded by Amy Wan, a securities transactions attorney who has worked in the U.S. Department of Commerce, and Dan Rice, a software engineer and founder of several blockchain and financial technology (fintech) companies.
Wan, who also founded document assembly legal startup Bootstrap Legal, came up with the idea behind Sagewise in fall 2017. She realized that initial coin offerings (ICO) were being targeted by cybercriminals, who would hack the smart contracts used to transfer funds.
“Every week there would be an ICO that got hacked for $2 million or $3 million, and the founders would shrug their shoulders and say, 'Oh well, this is how it works,'” Wan said.
Wan and Rice developed Sagewise, which aims to launch in fall 2018, to combat smart contracts' security vulnerabilities in a few different ways. For one, the startup offers a “smart contract notification monitoring tool that alerts you when your smart contract is about to execute,” Wan said. Such alerts could help prevent unauthorized transfers of funds.
In addition, Sagewise also has a software development kit, which is a set of software tools that work to essentially freeze the contract and prevent it from executing. This ability may be necessary when trying to fix any flaws in a smart contract or settle disputes that may have arisen if the contract executed incorrectly.
The last part of Sagewise's offering is a dispute resolution marketplace, where Wan said parties can choose from a number of services to help them settle their differences. These include automated dispute resolution bots for disputes involving nominal amounts of capital, traditional arbitrators and mediators, and “crowd juries,” which are crowd-sourced pools of jurors that have become popular among those operating those in cryptocurrency space.
Though many ICOs rely on smart contracts, and many organizations are pushing to develop this market, these types of automated contracts are still some time away from being used broadly in industries like legal. “I think we are very early on, and smart contract technology is very nascent,” Wan said.
But she added that part of the reason she launched Sagewise was to help the smart technology market mature. “The reason why smart contracts aren't more widely adopted today is because there are these gaps that no one really has addressed,” she said.
Whether the services Sagewise offers will make those in legal more willing to adopt more smart contracts, as opposed to just those in the ICO and cryptocurrency space, remains to be seen. But it may be a positive sign for the smart contract market that some legal entrepreneurs are looking to address security issues that may hinder its future growth.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
- 2Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
- 3Phila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
- 4Lost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
- 5New Associates Yearbook 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250