New Startup Wants to Secure Smart Contracts, Closes $1.25M in Funding
Sagewise looks to offer a set of tools to fix security holes in smart contracts and resolve disputes stemming from unauthorized executions of such contracts.
August 15, 2018 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
The promise of smart contracts, which automatically execute their terms on the blockchain without need of intermediaries, has caught the eye of many in the legal tech industry. But before such contracts can go mainstream, they have to fix a glaring problem: security lapses being easily exploited by cybercriminals.
Some investors, however, believe a recent legal tech startup has the answer. Sagewise, which markets itself as a “safety net for smart contracts,” recently closed on a $1.25 million funding round led by Wavemaker Genesis.
The startup was founded by Amy Wan, a securities transactions attorney who has worked in the U.S. Department of Commerce, and Dan Rice, a software engineer and founder of several blockchain and financial technology (fintech) companies.
Wan, who also founded document assembly legal startup Bootstrap Legal, came up with the idea behind Sagewise in fall 2017. She realized that initial coin offerings (ICO) were being targeted by cybercriminals, who would hack the smart contracts used to transfer funds.
“Every week there would be an ICO that got hacked for $2 million or $3 million, and the founders would shrug their shoulders and say, 'Oh well, this is how it works,'” Wan said.
Wan and Rice developed Sagewise, which aims to launch in fall 2018, to combat smart contracts' security vulnerabilities in a few different ways. For one, the startup offers a “smart contract notification monitoring tool that alerts you when your smart contract is about to execute,” Wan said. Such alerts could help prevent unauthorized transfers of funds.
In addition, Sagewise also has a software development kit, which is a set of software tools that work to essentially freeze the contract and prevent it from executing. This ability may be necessary when trying to fix any flaws in a smart contract or settle disputes that may have arisen if the contract executed incorrectly.
The last part of Sagewise's offering is a dispute resolution marketplace, where Wan said parties can choose from a number of services to help them settle their differences. These include automated dispute resolution bots for disputes involving nominal amounts of capital, traditional arbitrators and mediators, and “crowd juries,” which are crowd-sourced pools of jurors that have become popular among those operating those in cryptocurrency space.
Though many ICOs rely on smart contracts, and many organizations are pushing to develop this market, these types of automated contracts are still some time away from being used broadly in industries like legal. “I think we are very early on, and smart contract technology is very nascent,” Wan said.
But she added that part of the reason she launched Sagewise was to help the smart technology market mature. “The reason why smart contracts aren't more widely adopted today is because there are these gaps that no one really has addressed,” she said.
Whether the services Sagewise offers will make those in legal more willing to adopt more smart contracts, as opposed to just those in the ICO and cryptocurrency space, remains to be seen. But it may be a positive sign for the smart contract market that some legal entrepreneurs are looking to address security issues that may hinder its future growth.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250