Building Rock Star Teams and the Changing Nature of Legal Recruiting
In this podcast excerpt, Ari Kaplan talks with Zelda Owens of the Glenmont Group about how the legal recruiting process has changed and where technology is displacing human talent.
August 16, 2018 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Editor's Note: This is an excerpt from the Reinventing Professionals podcast, hosted by legal tech speaker and consultant Ari Kaplan, provided to Legaltech News. Kaplan speaks with Zelda Owens, the managing director of attorney placements for the Glenmont Group, a leading legal industry recruiting firm. She has also served as director of Women in E-Discovery's New York City chapter and as the chairperson of the Masters Conference.
Ari Kaplan: Tell us about your background and your role at the Glenmont Group.
Zelda Owens: My background is in information management and outsourcing. I have spent the past 11 years in the legal industry providing outsourcing services, particularly in e-discovery for law firms and corporations. I really wanted to focus on providing law firms and corporations exceptional legal talent so I joined the Glenmont Group.
Ari Kaplan: How has the recruiting process changed during your tenure in the field?
Zelda Owens: The recruiting process is much more transactional now than it was 10 years ago. Attorneys really had to develop networks of senior legal contacts in order to find great opportunities and it was much more relationship driven. Now, it's a much more transactional process because there is not a lot of available talent, while the need for attorneys and related positions has increased tremendously. I'm finding that as a recruiter, companies and law firms really want to see the profile, skillset, and success of attorneys in order to vet those that they want to hire.
Ari Kaplan: How can candidates distinguish themselves in an increasingly competitive market?
Zelda Owens: Attorneys must have additional skills in order to be competitive. For instance, I have been a resource for corporations and law firms in providing privacy counsel. Employers are looking for people who know how to work with software developers and IT leaders. Those attorneys are really in demand because they have deep domain expertise.
Ari Kaplan: In what areas is technology displacing human talent?
Zelda Owens: In law, I would have to say it is in areas effectively utilizing artificial intelligence. In the discovery world, instead of having live human attorneys go through documents, algorithms are now choosing the records on which attorneys should focus. As a result, it takes much less talent to review that material. Anything that requires a judgment call that is repeatable will be replaced by technology.
Ari Kaplan: You moderated a panel at the New York City Masters Conference on July 24 about building what you called “rockstar” teams. What are some best practices for law firms and law departments who are interested in doing just that?
Zelda Owens: Actually, the general counsel on our panel mentioned that he doesn't need a “rockstar” team. He wants a team that can perform consistently, and in a timely and cost-effective manner. Although law firms feel that they have to provide the very best talent and service, corporations are increasingly recognizing that this approach is just too expensive and can exceed their budget. Often, all they want is a team that is good and reliable. That was a very surprising revelation as we engaged in our discussion.
Ari Kaplan: Where do you see legal recruiting headed?
Zelda Owens: Legal recruiting, especially at the junior level, will continue to be transactional so that the law firms themselves can use technology and online services to find good talent. For more senior, sophisticated attorney talent, human recruiters will definitely continue to vet and shepherd people through the process so that corporations and law firms can find top talent that will fit into their senior level teams.
Ari Kaplan regularly interviews leaders in the legal industry and in the broader professional services community to share perspective, highlight transformative change, and introduce new technology at ReinventingProfessionals.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250