Clio Integrates With Its First On-Demand Legal Service Provider
For a young company like Lawclerk, the integration provides an opportunity to expand its exposure and potentially define its future growth. And from Clio's standpoint, it's about working with companies that are "pushing the boundaries of innovation in legal technology."
August 16, 2018 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
Practice management software provider Clio and on-demand legal service provider Lawclerk, which connects clients to an online marketplace of freelance attorneys, have announced an integration of their platforms in a bid to better serve their similar legal customer bases and support mutual growth. The integration is just one of dozens for Clio since announcing a renewed focus on partnering with legal tech companies at its user conference in 2017.
The integration will allow Lawclerk users to automatically sync billing information, project deadlines and tasks to the Clio platform. Those using Clio can also transfer documents directly to Lawclerk as well.
Kristin Tyler, co-founder of Lawclerk, said the integration was driven in part by the fact that Lawclerk and Clio have similar legal clients. “We are both really focused on serving solo attorneys in small and medium-sized firms,” she said.
What's more, she noted that those using Clio were also likely to use Lawclerk. “The attorneys that we met that used Clio in their practices tend to be a bit more entrepreneurial and innovative than people who aren't using practice management yet … and they tend to be willing to try new things if it will help them get their job done.”
Andrew Gay, manager of product partnerships at Clio, added that with the integration, Clio saw “an opportunity that aligned with our vision to offer our customers unique value.”
Though Lawclerk is the first on-demand legal services company to integrate with Clio, Gay said that Clio is open to integrate with others in the on-demand legal services market—a market that includes companies likes Avvo, Rocket Lawyer and LegalZoom. “We have not, at this point, set up an exclusive relationship with Lawclerk and there is an opportunity for others to build an integration with Clio,” Gay said.
Gay noted that Clio's goal is “building and developing long-term relationships with companies like Lawclerk that are pushing the boundaries of innovation in legal technology.”
For such a young company like Lawclerk, which launched in January 2018, the integration provides an opportunity to expand their exposure and potentially define their future growth. In the short term, Lawclerk hopes the Clio integration will “attract more attorneys to the site … and we hope this will bring more visibility to our company,” Tyler said.
She added that Lawclerk will consider integrating with other practice management platforms in the future if there's “enough demand, and if there is a different practice management company [our clients] are using.”
The integration also may also provide Lawclerk with an opportunity to secure additional investment. At its 2017 user conference, Clio launched a developer contest named Launch/Code, which will give out “a $100,000 prize for the best the integration for Clio,” Gay said. Submissions to the contest ended in August 2018—right before Lawclerk integrated with the platform—and winners will be chosen in the weeks to come.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250