In Her New Book, Law Professor Says GCs Who Want Outside Counsel 'Innovation' Need to Define It
Michele DeStefano, a law professor at the University of Miami, set out to explore what innovation means to lawyers, including in-house leaders, in a new book. She discovered that there are numerous definitions.
August 23, 2018 at 01:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
University of Miami law professor Michele DeStefano picked the brains of dozens of general counsel around the globe for her new book about legal innovation, and most of them agreed on some key points.
“I wasn't surprised by their answers, but I was surprised by the consistency of their answers,” said DeStefano, author of “Legal Upheaval: A Guide to Creativity, Collaboration, and Innovation in Law.” She spoke with Corporate Counsel in an interview Wednesday.
For instance, she found the No.1 complaint from GCs was that their outside counsel “are constantly providing service that misses the mark. It overreaches—giving you a Maserati when you just want a Ford, or it misses the mark altogether by being disconnected from the reality of the situation.”
General counsel, DeStefano said, want their outside counsel to understand what the legal department is going through, and that in-house counsel are being pushed to change by their internal clients. The book does not reveal the identities of the general counsel nor their companies.
Another consistent thread DeStefano found was the lack of agreement among in-house leaders about what “innovation” really means.
“Their answers show it's really about attitude, culture and behavior that change a relationship to collaborative,” she said. “Almost everybody said the same thing —it's about small noticeable changes” and not big, dramatic ones.
“That says to me that the legal marketplace is not in the land of Big Disruption yet,” DeStefano said. “Almost everyone wants outside counsel just to move the needle a little. And we're not talking about a new measurement or new dashboard—we're talking about moving the needle on the same dashboard.”
That can be hard, the law professor explained, because collaborative problem-solving doesn't come easy to some lawyers. “It means spending a lot of time talking about the problem and building to a solution, instead of just going out and trying to fix the problem yourself,” she added.
DeStefano said one step general counsel can take to fix the disconnect with their outside counsel is to more clearly delineate what innovation they want. Her book tries to show them how to do that.
“It's like law firm diversity was a few years ago,” she said. “Law firms said, 'oh, yeah, we're diverse.' So general counsel had to get very specific in what they wanted to see in terms of numbers and policies and relationships in order for law firms to really diversify.”
Now, she said, general counsel need to better define innovation and quantify it as much as possible in their RFPs.
In the book's introduction several GCs, who did agree to be named, talked about legal innovation.
Jeffrey Carr, senior vice president and GC at Univar Inc. and former GC at FMCcTechnologies Inc., said, “'Innovation' is one of the most misused and misunderstood terms in Law-Land. Much characterized as innovative isn't. … Michele DeStefano utilizes interviews, critical analysis, and humorous, conversational writing to provide a practical road map to actually innovate—but it requires behavioral change, commitment, and rigor.”
Horacio Gutierrez, general counsel and vice president of business and legal affairs at Spotify, called the book “a thought-provoking account of the unthinkable truth: All lawyers should learn how to innovate, even if their business model isn't broken.”
DeStefano has made innovation an element of her own career. In 2010, she created LawWithoutWalls, a unique program in which students from more than 35 law schools around the globe form teams with legal and business leaders to find solutions to a real-world problem. She is also a guest faculty member in Harvard Law School's executive education program.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 3Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 4In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 5Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250