Tech Counsel Are Prepping for Possible Loss of H-1B Spouse Work Permits
A Trump policy discontinuing at least some H-4 visa work permits for the spouses of foreign-born workers has advanced another step through the rulemaking process.
August 23, 2018 at 12:17 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The spouses of H-1B visa holders—who hold H-4 visas—could lose their right to work in the United States under a Trump administration policy change in the works.
Silicon Valley news outlet The Mercury News reported Wednesday that senior leaders in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security have moved a step closer toward final approval of a policy change, part of Trump's “Buy American and Hire American” executive order, that would stop at least some H-1B spouses from working in the country.
If the change goes through, some immigration lawyers say it could hurt American tech companies, which employ many H-1B holders, as it would make the U.S. a less attractive spot for global top talent.
“People could cut their assignments short because the spouse is not able to work, or they might not be willing to accept an assignment in the United States at all because the spouse is not able to work,” said Valentine Brown, a partner at Duane Morris who deals with immigration issues.
Brown said it's easier in many other countries for spouses to get work permits, and top talent may choose to go there from the start.
If H-1B workers already in the U.S. leave—because their spouse doesn't want to live in a place where they can't work, or because the family can't live on one income—employee relocation costs could be high. Companies often spend thousands of dollars sponsoring H-1B workers, a process that takes a lot of both money and time.
“It can be very costly for employers when things like this change,” Brown said. She noted that, in an economy with low unemployment it could also be harmful for employers to lose workers they need to function.
H-4 visa holders' employers should keep in mind these employees may not have working rights in the U.S. should the policy change go through, said Caroline Tang, a shareholder at Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart who works on immigration cases. Employers should know when workers' current permits expire, and be aware of the potential that they'll be un-renewable.
Brown said employers can also have an open door policy for workers concerned about the potential end to H-4 visa work permits, so employees can ask questions and feel secure that the company is staying on top of any immigration law changes.
The work permits are a fairly recent development. Tang noted that the government only began to issue them back in 2015 under President Barack Obama.
“Before [that], a lot of these H-4 spouses just never worked,” Tang said. “They just came to the U.S.—a lot of them would give up their jobs at home—and never be a part of the U.S. workforce.”
In addition to the growing H-4 threat, the Trump White House has also criticized the H-1B program itself. A recent study from the National Foundation for American Policy showed that between the third and fourth quarter of FY 2017 the proportion of H-1B visas denied to foreign-born workers increased by 41 percent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250