Finding the Needle in the Haystack Through Enterprise E-Discovery
How and where to begin finding information in a growing data store? These steps can serve as the starting point for such a project.
August 28, 2018 at 08:00 AM
6 minute read
Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? – T.S. Eliot
I spend most days on calls with compliance teams discussing electronic records compliance and supporting regulatory e-discovery requests that cover content ranging from emails to text messaging, to industry messaging platforms such as Bloomberg, Reuters and Symphony and trading, to financial and HR compliance documents.
Although capturing the myriad of financial and communication records has been a challenge for legal departments, tremendous strides have been made in consolidating and managing electronic records. The primary reason is that financial regulators require legal departments and institutions to produce these records within days and there simply hasn't been time to collect and organize those records after receiving an e-discovery request. Having the infrastructure and collection methodologies in place and incorporated into IT operations is seen as “best practices.”
Not only are firms able to capture electronic data, but they now have the e-discovery tools that allow them to quickly find information or, if you will, the needles in the haystack. And the challenges are many. Here are some of the issues that need to be integrated in searches:
- Differentiate symbol-searches from word-searches. For instance, Sotheby's symbol is BID, which may need to be filtered from all other communications with the word, 'bid;'
- Identify the language of the communication. Trading is multi-lingual, so searches need to identify the communication's language and use the appropriate language equivalent;
- Integrate abbreviations used by traders and salespeople. Used abbreviations need to be integrated into a table of synonyms, for instance, CB (can bid), CM (call me), LDL (let's discuss later), DOL (discuss off-line);
- Integrate changes in user's email addresses, including the ability of the search system to integrate with Active Directory aliases or other table of email variations.
These e-discovery tools not only fulfill both legal production requests, but also communication supervision. Many industries have regulations that require a compliance team to monitor and evidence-review of communications, which may involve emails relating to international gifts and entertainment (FCPA) or financial communications (FINRA Rule 3110). In the past 10 years, costs for these systems have dropped dramatically, while providing much higher levels of control and filtering. For instance, at one large institution, we were able to reduce the number of email reviewers from 25 to eight by creating more focused search expressions and, thereby, reducing the number of messages flagged.
The management consultant, Peter Drucker, rightfully wrote that we now are all knowledge workers. Everyone—from assembly line workers to lawyers—needs information to perform in the global economy. However, Drucker could not have foreseen how much electronic content would be created in the coming decades and how email and other messaging platforms would largely replace the 'letter' and hard-copy reports.
We are now seeing the beginnings of a transformation in which the e-discovery tools used by the legal team will be rolled-out to all knowledge workers within an organization. This transformation will have a profound effect upon how systems are used, the support requirement for those systems and the efficiencies gained. We have advised our clients on their long-term strategy and the necessary starting point: A commitment from the legal department and senior management.
Legal teams often work separately from the operational side of businesses and are not generally involved with the day-to-day activities of other knowledge workers. This needs to change, and the legal teams will find themselves in the unaccustomed and uncomfortable role of having to:
- Configure permissions so that only corporate data relevant to a knowledge worker is accessed;
- Train users as to how to structure queries;
- Advise as to how to iteratively filter data so that the knowledge worker can arrive at 'wisdom' rather than information or, worse, data;
- Develop policies for the knowledge worker and, more broadly, the knowledge business to utilize the institutional e-discovery system.
The Four Steps to Implementing Enterprise E-Discovery
Of course, how and where to begin? We have found the following four steps as the starting point for such a project:
1. Consolidate all data or information sources. This is a tedious process but probably best assigned to the IT Team. Each department should be interviewed for both of the following:
- What platforms are used to conduct business? Are documents on fileshares? Sharepoint? Are collaborative platforms used such as Microsoft's Teams, Skype or Yammer; Cisco's WebEx Teams, Slack or Salesforce's Quip?
- What type of queries are valuable for the department? Have all customer agreements containing a term or all accounts with a custodial relationship been considered?
2. Evaluate the many e-discovery platforms which are available (this may be done concurrently with the first step above).
- How does Microsoft's Advanced e-discovery compare with Relativity, Nuix, Exterro or Clearwell?
- What are the differences between various e-discovery vendors' capabilities and licensing terms? Some are conducive to enterprise roll-out and some focus on just the legal department.
3. Integrate the consolidated sources with the e-discovery product's indexing and search capabilities, including building the key word and metadata tables that allow for the rapid searching of data haystacks.
4. Set up a Support Team. This role may be part of either legal or compliance but will involve training and help desk support for users accessing the data.
The challenge is to balance the costs and benefits for each department. Does HR need these tools? Does investment banking? Not all departments nor even all institutions will find the investment worth the cost in either financial or organizational terms. Many knowledge workers will be left just with data.
We believe most organizations will see the value of distributing e-discovery tools to their knowledge workers, just as manufacturing companies found implementing robots greatly empowered production workers.
Not all e-discovery vendors will be able to re-tool their platforms to support large organizations, as it will involve incorporating complex permissioning and data access design. Most will, however, as they'll quickly understand the tremendous market opportunity for large e-discovery licensing and the advantage of making e-discovery an institutional rather than a legal department spend.
So, what becomes of the data Haystack in most institutions?
We believe Peter Drucker would be excited by the opportunity for knowledge workers to avail themselves of haystacks of data and use search, analytical and business intelligence tools to reduce those haystacks to the necessary needles. As robots have transformed manufacturing lines, e-discovery systems will transform the knowledge worker and deliver dramatic change in the productivity of knowledge workers and, in turn, to their institutions.
Douglas Weeden, J.D., is Director, Compliance & e-discovery for 17a-4, llc.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 2Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 3Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 4Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
- 5Former U.S. Dept. of Education Attorney Suspended for Failure to Complete CLE Credits
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250