Former Google Legal Tech Manager Dishes on Move to Seal Software
Seal recently announced Julian Tsisin as vice president of legal markets. He talked with LTN about the importance of Seal's Apogee Legal acquisition, his engineering background and more.
August 31, 2018 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
|
As the market for artificial intelligence-powered contract analytics solutions garners more interest from investors, technology providers behind such products are looking to staff up with top legal talent. And in looking to keep up with the market, Seal Software has become the latest to add a former corporate legal professional to its ranks.
In late August, Seal announced the appointment of Julian Tsisin as vice president of legal markets. Tsisin was most recently senior program manager of legal technology at Google and before that served as manager of practice services, business technology at Disney.
Tsisin spoke with Legaltech News on why he moved from the corporate world to the legal technology sector, how he hopes to leverage his past legal tech experience at Seal and what it was like working in some of the largest and most innovative companies in the U.S. economy.
Legaltech News: What type of legal tech work did you oversee at Google?
Julian Tsisin: I was at Google for four years, and I was part of a legal technology team which grew when I was there. My responsibilities included running various technology initiatives and working with the larger corporate legal team at Google. I initially managed Google's patent and intellectual property technologies, then I moved to more legal department-wide initiatives like contract analytics and enterprise search.
Why leave Google for Seal?
I left Google for personal reasons, because I had been commuting from Los Angeles to Google for four years, and I just wanted to be closer to my family. But I've seen how legal technology has changed in the past few years, and contract analytics is a very hot topic in general. So I've been following Seal for quite some time, and I like what Seal has been doing.
One thing that was really interesting to me was that Seal acquired a company called Apogee Legal, and I knew Apogee a little bit. I've met them before. And the fact that Seal, a large legal AI company, decided to purchase Apogee Legal, which has a huge domain expertise in legal, specifically was just an amazing move.
I don't think the market understands how important this move is because, while a lot of legal AI companies have new technologies today in the market, not all legal problems can be addressed by technology alone. You need people with legal domain expertise. And now Seal has 30 lawyers on staff, training models and helping customers.
What types of legal technology did you implement at Disney?
I was at Disney for almost for 7½ years, also running legal technology projects. I managed various types of technology initiatives around patents, copyrights and trademarks. I also worked on a system for anti-privacy and infringement—basically it's a digital enterprise system to find infringing materials online. And I worked on litigation systems, e-billing systems, so basically everything a large legal department would use.
My background is in computer science, but while at Disney I also went to law school at night to become a lawyer.
Why become both a computer engineer and lawyer?
I've been in the legal field for a very long time on the technology side. The main reasons why I wanted to get a degree was to understand the legal side of things better and to become a partner to lawyers. I didn't even think about taking the bar at the time, but after I went to law school, I took it in California. I don't practice, but this gave me a better view of the legal space.
What do you hope to accomplish at Seal?
I want to learn as much as I can, because I've never been part of a technology startup. My overall role and responsibilities has two parts. Because of my dual background in technology and legal, I'm part of the office of the CTO, but I'm also working very closely with the CEO of Apogee, who is now a chief strategy officer [at Seal], too. Part of my role is to become a bridge between the strategy and the technology and to improve that part of the business. My other responsibility is to work on the legal strategy and expand Seal's presence in the legal market.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
- 2NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
- 3Texas Trial Boutique Matches Milbank Bonuses, Paying up to $140K
- 4'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
- 5On the Employment Front, What Changes Are Likely Under Trump?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250