Kira Systems Raises $50M in First Outside Funding Round
The automated contract review company, which has received a nine-figure valuation, has snagged its first influx of capital via external investment.
September 05, 2018 at 09:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Kira Systems has raised $50 million in its first round of venture capital fundraising as the company's automated contract review becomes more popular among large law firms and corporate clients.
The fundraising comes from Insight Venture Partners, a New York-based private equity and venture capital investor in software businesses, and values the Toronto-based artificial intelligence company at a nine-figure number, said Kira CEO Noah Waisberg.
The $50 million minority investment is the first time Kira, founded by Waisberg and Alexander Hudek in 2011, has received outside financing. The so-far “bootstrapped” company has grown to about 115 employees after having 35 employees at the start of 2017, Waisberg said.
The company's revenue has also grown about 100 percent annually, added Waisberg, declining to provide specific figures. Waisberg said the funding would help Kira grow as it seeks to tap into what its CEO called a “latent demand” for contract review services.
“There is a huge amount of legal work and contract review that is not done and it is not done because it is economically impossible to get through the volume of documents that need to be reviewed,” Waisberg said. “And our true opportunity is helping people tackle that latent demand of contracts that might be reviewed but aren't right now.”
While a typical acquisition of a $200 million company may now include reviewing about 100 contracts, Waisberg said that Kira's software, which can cut the time it takes to review contracts by up to 90 percent, could be used to greatly expand that number.
“If you think about a world where instead of reviewing 100 contracts, people are reviewing 5,000, you have to have a world where it's easier to get the contracts into the software and getting it out,” said Waisberg, a former associate at Weil, Gotshal & Manges. “So the company would put a lot of work into building [automated systems] that make that action happen.”
In order to make automated contract review more widespread, Waisberg said Kira will focus its energy toward building a product that gives clients “answers” to their contract problems, rather than simply spotting certain aspects of a contract. Kira is also set to release more than 100 new provisions that its software can detect “out of the box” before a client has to train the software. Kira's software will be able to identify about 550 provisions, Waisberg said.
Kira's growth was accelerated in 2014 when Big Four accounting firm Deloitte signed on as a subscriber. Deloitte now has more than 5,000 professionals using Kira, which Waisberg said is the largest deployment of artificial intelligence software by any professional services firm.
Big Law clients including Clifford Chance, DLA Piper, Fenwick & West and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer have been Kira subscribers since 2016, Waisberg said. Since the start of 2017, five of the top 10 firms ranked by the Vault legal directory have signed up to use Kira, he added. Today, the “majority” of the top 30 firms in the Am Law 100 use Kira, Waisberg said.
“I don't know that we could comfortably have grown much quicker than we have been, and we still had financial room to grow without this raise, but we think there is a lot of opportunity around contract review,” Waisberg said. “Massive amounts of time are still spent reviewing contracts and people still aren't getting all the information they might out of them.”
One reason why Waisberg said a world where 5,000 documents are reviewed for every deal may not materialize is what he described as the “hype” surrounding AI legal products. If people think AI can do more than it can, that disappointment may cause a lack of adoption among law firms and clients, Waisberg said.
“There are a lot of firms getting value out of [Kira] software as it is right now, and that's a good thing,” Waisberg said. “I don't think we're too hype-y. People trust us and have found value with us. But the hype in the industry does hurt.”
Peter Sobiloff, a managing director at Insight Venture Partners, will join the Kira board as part of the financing. Jonathan Rosenbaum, a senior associate at Insight, will also act as a board observer.
“Kira Systems' performance as a bootstrapped business has been impressive, and we're eager to partner with them to more aggressively pursue growth,” Sobiloff said in a statement. “We don't see many pure-play AI businesses with their traction, and this success has come from the fact that Kira is fundamentally changing how contracts are reviewed. This represents an opportunity to make a meaningful impact across their core market segments.”
In April, Israeli AI-based contract review platform LawGeex announced a $12 million Series B funding round led by Israeli venture capital firm Aleph. LawGeex has raised nearly $22 million.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250