JAMS Preps for Future Blockchain, Crypto Arbitration With New Practice
The ADR group's new practice leader is Zeichner Ellman & Krause CISO Daniel Garrie, who argues “you need to change the rules” of disputes for new technologies.
September 07, 2018 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
|
Blockchain is poised to reshape the practice of law, and dispute resolution is no exception.
Alternative dispute resolution group JAMS, which made a name for itself in tech circles as an e-discovery mediator, is trying to get ahead of the curve, launching a practice that specifically focuses on issues involving cryptocurrencies, blockchains and smart contracts.
The practice is placing a particular emphasis on the creation of protocols specifically for disputes involving blockchain, a technology that has featured in litigation particularly around cryptocurrencies, as well as in the practice of law via contracts.
A release announcing the practice group was largely mum on the specifics of such protocols. However, JAMS neutral Daniel Garrie, a key participant in the practice, told The Recorder the group is “having conversations with several corporate players and a new court project that are evaluating and looking at them.”
Likewise, JAMS senior vice president and chief legal and operating officer Kimberly Taylor mentioned “behind-the-scenes” conversations for developing protocols applicable across industries.
Describing the focus of JAMS' efforts around blockchain in arbitration, Taylor noted, “When you've got pen and paper and hard copy contracts to review and determine parties' obligations and expenses, this is [now] all existing in a virtual world. Some of the data points are irrefutable because they're captured in the blockchain, so the future of how they'll be resolved is going to be different.”
“The parties' expectations of timing are going to be much more rigorous than commercial arbitration,” she added, noting that blockchain and the technologies toward which its applied could mean parties acting more rapidly with less delay.
JAMS is likely the only established ADR group with a practice area focusing on blockchain-specific disputes. However, the technology has been leveraged in a platform by startup Juris Project. Likewise, Jury.Online was reported last fall by CoinTelegraph to have been working on a dispute-resolution protocol for judges and parties to deliberate and execute deals involving cryptographic systems and blockchain.
Garrie and Taylor didn't specify timelines for rules, though they noted that they're currently in the drafting stages.
A number of law firms have entered the blockchain space, such as Anderson Kill; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; and Frost Brown Todd. What's more, a multinational firm called the Blockchain Law Group boasts token issuance and escrow services in transactions involving blockchain, among its services.
JAMS for its part is no newbie to the innovation game. The organization counts itself a member of the smart contracts consortium, The Accord Project, which boasts a number of law firms among its ranks.
Overall, Taylor noted, with blockchain, it's “a very nascent world, and I think a lot of companies are trying to determine how this great technology is going to be applicable in their environment.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
- 2Texas Trial Boutique Matches Milbank Bonuses, Paying up to $140K
- 3'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
- 4On the Employment Front, What Changes Are Likely Under Trump?
- 5By the Numbers: The 2024 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250