Ayfie Unloads New E-Discovery Program With Linguistic Context Expertise
Ayfie Accelerator provides users with linguistic-based text analysis that can be taught by users or use machine learning to grasp the context and concept of multiple documents, categorize it and deliver it an easy to digest format.
September 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Ayfie is fully stepping into the e-discovery fold with its newest program, ayfie Accelerator. Accelerator leverages linguistic-based text analysis and machine learning to grasp the contexts and concepts within documents, categorize terms and deliver it an easy to digest format.
What it is: Ayfie's Accelerator is an e-discovery and contract review platform and the latest addition to ayfie's software suite, which includes programs that help practitioners analyze text, index content, and identify sensitive data like personally identifiable information.
How it works: Accelerator users can utilize conceptual searches as a way to find documents with similar concepts and traits. The searches work by either entering keywords or uploading entire document, which the program reviews to find similar additional documents.
Users are also able to use supervised and unsupervised conceptual clustering within the e-discovery platform. With supervised conceptual clustering, users must fill in what categories their document is about to help train the system to find conceptually similar documents. In unsupervised conceptual clustering, users forgo predefining categories, and the machine is left to determine the categories on its own.
In addition, Accelerator also offers email threading and a number of data visualization tools to help users “evaluate complex datasets under time pressure,” according to a press release provided by ayfie.
There are also collaborative features offered within Accelerator that allow users to see who is working on a specific project, assign other users to specific projects, and leave annotations on documents.
A GDPR Focus: Given that Accelerator allows users to search for personally identifiable information in the data they collect and review, ayfie is quick to stress that its e-discovery tool can be an asset when it comes to General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance efforts.
“When you talk to people about it [the GDPR], they tend to believe they have control of the CRM, they have control of their compliance,” said said Johannes Stiehler, chief technology officer of ayfie. He added, “The sad truth is that GDPR pertains to all data… it pertains to your email box, your Dropbox.”
Given that users of the e-discovery platform may be handling sensitive information, Stiehler noted that ayfie designed Accelerator to make sure all data handled within the system is encrypted and can only be accessed with proper credentials.
Competition: Stiehler said any provider of document review is a competitor for ayfie Accelarator. These can include e-discovery platforms offered by Catalyst, Exterro, QDiscovery, and Relativity, among many others.
Stiehler, however, noted ayfie also works together with many e-discovery providers. According to ayfie's website, for instance, it's “Inspector” text analytics engine can power workflows within Relativity's e-discovery platform.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250