The Expanding Impact of Legal Procurement
Ari Kaplan went to the Buying Legal Council's 2018 Legal Procurement Conference and found remarkable alignment of procurement and the provision of legal services.
September 12, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
Six years ago, I wrote an article for Law.com called “Procurement Process Embraces Legal Services” and concluded that “procurement professionals have become much more active and influential within their corporate legal departments because the general counsel is under tremendous pressure to reduce costs in the economic downturn.” While chief legal officers still bear that weight, the conversation around law department management is a much richer one, as evidenced by the themes of innovation, value, client service, and transparency, which the Buying Legal Council's 2018 Legal Procurement Conference showcased on September 5 and 6.
|Innovation and Transparency
Software AG general counsel Dr. Benno Quade captivated the audience with his discussion of designing his own dashboard for tracking and evaluating legal spend. “Lawyers are born coders because we are taught to work with yes and no questions,” he advised.
Despite the challenge of internally managing 400,000 lines of code, he noted, “Transparency is critical and data-driven discussions of invoices are far more productive.” At his company, legal is perceived as one of the organization's most innovative groups. “Lawyers and procurement leaders should be interested in coding because it is part of the future of work,” he remarked.
|Client Service
Justin Ergler, the director of alternative fee intelligence and analytics at GlaxoSmithKline (winner of the Buying Legal Council's 2018 award for innovation), and Keith Maziarek, the director of pricing and legal project management at Katten Muchin Rosenman, offered an insightful presentation on empowering the relationship between legal departments and their outside counsel. “Law firms should present their new technology and describe how it benefits the client's work,” the duo suggested in discussing the alignment of communication and transparency. “Law firms should also provide a value report to their clients,” they added.
|Value
International legal pricing consultant Richard Burcher, the founder and managing director of Validatum, highlighted the inherent challenge of procurement. “There is a very real disconnect between price and value,” he said. “Understanding the pricing of risk is critical,” he added.
The need for collaboration in harmonizing these factors was the focus of a panel discussion moderated by Rebekah Mintzer, an editor at ALM's Corporate Counsel. “Legal services procurement should be part of a broader approach,” advised Marty Harlow, the procurement director for global legal services at GlaxoSmithKline. “Procurement is Switzerland; we focus on managing the process, providing decision-grade data, and staying in our lane,” he added. In terms of getting started, “court reporting and labor and employment outside counsel spend are the easiest areas in which to begin applying procurement to legal services,” noted Vandana Dhamija, the founder and CEO of Legal Operations Consulting.
Despite the variety of ways to apply procurement, it is critical to focus on where the organization will realize the greatest benefit. “There are challenges to swinging for the fences in procurement,” said Alan Bryan, the senior associate general counsel for legal operations and outside counsel management at Walmart, who encouraged coordination and a balanced approach with the legal department.
“I think it's the reality that in-house counsel – working closely with procurement professionals – are quickly becoming the 'lawyer as general contractor,' assembling the right mix of legal service providers, outside counsel, and in-house resources to handle their legal needs efficiently and cost-effectively,” says Christopher Schultz, the general counsel of Level 2 Legal Solutions, a provider of managed review services and signature sponsor of the conference for the second consecutive year. “Law firms that are focused on offering to their clients defensible, repeatable processes with robust quality and cost-control built in are the firms of the future.”
While the thesis of my six-year-old article remains as current today as it was in 2012, there has been a remarkable alignment of procurement and the provision of legal services that is fueling a robust conversation about innovation, value, client service, and transparency. In fact, “The conference was another illustration of the significant progress the BLC community is making in shifting from supplier-driven to buyer-centric in the legal services space,” concluded attendee, Jim Delkousis, the founder and CEO of Persuit, a software platform designed to streamline the procurement process for corporate legal and procurement teams and their law firms.
Attorney and legal industry analyst Ari Kaplan presented “Beyond the Numbers: What Pricing Professionals Can Learn from a Decade of Legal Industry Benchmarking” at the 2018 North American Legal Procurement conference. He is an inaugural Fastcase 50 honoree, serves as the principal researcher for a variety of widely distributed market research reports, and has been the keynote speaker for events worldwide. Learn more at AriKaplanAdvisors.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250