Behind the Scenes of Nuix's Acquisition of E-Discovery Software Ringtail
Nuix expects growth with its new business and wants to get rid of 'preconceived notions' of a legacy tool.
September 13, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
|
“I'll be completely honest, when I was first asked to look at it as part of the due diligence process, I went in with a preconceived notion,” said Stephen Stewart, chief technology officer at Nuix.
It's a common refrain, and one I've heard about many legal technologies that are considered “legacy” in this still-emerging market. Ringtail released its version 9.5 in July; among some e-discovery observers, that might as well make it from somewhere in the Mesozoic Age.
But that's not where the story ends, not this time. Stewart continued, “Upon seeing it, I was like, 'Holy cow! This is not anything like what I expected.' This is a modern, awesome interface with great analytics, and truth be told, it has every feature I've ever been asked for on an RFP.”
Earlier this week, Nuix announced it had acquired FTI Consulting's Ringtail e-discovery business for $55 million, one of the largest acquisitions in a year of e-discovery M&A. As part of the deal, the Ringtail software came under Nuix's purview, as did FTI's Ringtail-specific employees and customers. Customers that had been with FTI first, meanwhile, stayed with the company, though with the continued option to license the software through Nuix.
Now, it falls to Nuix to try and promote the software through what Stewart called the “Nuix megaphone.” He said the early response from Nuix customers has been positive, but the company's looking to expand the technology's reach through a now-unified platform.
“People had written it off because they wouldn't buy from a competitor, or because quite frankly they had a dated view of what Ringtail was,” Stewart said. “That's just a huge mistake: Ringtail's a fantastic platform with amazing analytics.”
The competitor piece is one that can't be ignored. Although Ringtail was a largely autonomous unit within the larger FTI Consulting umbrella, the FTI association made reselling it a nonstarter for many competing legal technology advisory services. Now that the association has changed, Stewart said, he's already received calls from partners who sell Nuix and now are looking at including Ringtail in the package. And that's building off a large pre-existing customer base—Stewart noted that “FTI will be our biggest retail customer coming out of this. … FTI still has a huge Ringtail install that they will be using to service their customers.”
So what's the end goal for Nuix? E-discovery is a crowded marketplace, albeit one with an ever-growing $10 billion-plus industry valuation. Nuix is hoping to leverage Ringtail's analytics in particular as a market differentiator, both for e-discovery work and “across the entire spectrum of data that Nuix deals with,” including security, user behavior and more. While those analytics may have been cost-prohibitive or simply too difficult to parse in the past, “the simplicity of being able to use analytics on every matter, regardless of size or scale, really brings analytics to everybody, which is one of our key desires,” Stewart said.
And especially for e-discovery software providers such as Nuix, there is business to be gained with market differentiators. Although Stewart wouldn't say the name Relativity outright, it's clear that's where Nuix is aiming with the acquisition. “When you look at the review market space, there is a clear and incumbent technology that has a huge percentage of the marketplace,” he explained. “And in order to catch up, we are incredibly fortunate to basically come out of the gate and effectively acquire their peer, if not their superior when it comes to in-built analytics.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 2Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
- 3What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 4AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 5New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250