Behind the Scenes of Nuix's Acquisition of E-Discovery Software Ringtail
Nuix expects growth with its new business and wants to get rid of 'preconceived notions' of a legacy tool.
September 13, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
“I'll be completely honest, when I was first asked to look at it as part of the due diligence process, I went in with a preconceived notion,” said Stephen Stewart, chief technology officer at Nuix.
It's a common refrain, and one I've heard about many legal technologies that are considered “legacy” in this still-emerging market. Ringtail released its version 9.5 in July; among some e-discovery observers, that might as well make it from somewhere in the Mesozoic Age.
But that's not where the story ends, not this time. Stewart continued, “Upon seeing it, I was like, 'Holy cow! This is not anything like what I expected.' This is a modern, awesome interface with great analytics, and truth be told, it has every feature I've ever been asked for on an RFP.”
Earlier this week, Nuix announced it had acquired FTI Consulting's Ringtail e-discovery business for $55 million, one of the largest acquisitions in a year of e-discovery M&A. As part of the deal, the Ringtail software came under Nuix's purview, as did FTI's Ringtail-specific employees and customers. Customers that had been with FTI first, meanwhile, stayed with the company, though with the continued option to license the software through Nuix.
Now, it falls to Nuix to try and promote the software through what Stewart called the “Nuix megaphone.” He said the early response from Nuix customers has been positive, but the company's looking to expand the technology's reach through a now-unified platform.
“People had written it off because they wouldn't buy from a competitor, or because quite frankly they had a dated view of what Ringtail was,” Stewart said. “That's just a huge mistake: Ringtail's a fantastic platform with amazing analytics.”
The competitor piece is one that can't be ignored. Although Ringtail was a largely autonomous unit within the larger FTI Consulting umbrella, the FTI association made reselling it a nonstarter for many competing legal technology advisory services. Now that the association has changed, Stewart said, he's already received calls from partners who sell Nuix and now are looking at including Ringtail in the package. And that's building off a large pre-existing customer base—Stewart noted that “FTI will be our biggest retail customer coming out of this. … FTI still has a huge Ringtail install that they will be using to service their customers.”
So what's the end goal for Nuix? E-discovery is a crowded marketplace, albeit one with an ever-growing $10 billion-plus industry valuation. Nuix is hoping to leverage Ringtail's analytics in particular as a market differentiator, both for e-discovery work and “across the entire spectrum of data that Nuix deals with,” including security, user behavior and more. While those analytics may have been cost-prohibitive or simply too difficult to parse in the past, “the simplicity of being able to use analytics on every matter, regardless of size or scale, really brings analytics to everybody, which is one of our key desires,” Stewart said.
And especially for e-discovery software providers such as Nuix, there is business to be gained with market differentiators. Although Stewart wouldn't say the name Relativity outright, it's clear that's where Nuix is aiming with the acquisition. “When you look at the review market space, there is a clear and incumbent technology that has a huge percentage of the marketplace,” he explained. “And in order to catch up, we are incredibly fortunate to basically come out of the gate and effectively acquire their peer, if not their superior when it comes to in-built analytics.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 2Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 3Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 4Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 5Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250