Q&A

Why Atrium's Justin Kan Thinks He Can Make Clients—and Lawyers—Happier

The Twitch founder, whose New Law venture Atrium just raised $65 million, says his company can make legal services more efficient for clients and more "meaningful" for lawyers.

September 13, 2018 at 02:00 AM

5 minute read

The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer


Justin Kan of Atrium.

Silicon Valley entrepreneur Justin Kan first put himself in the public eye over a decade ago when he spent eight months broadcasting a 24-7 live feed of his life online. This experiment in “lifecasting” led to the startup Twitch, which found a niche in livestreaming video game play. The company was purchased by Amazon for $970 million in 2014.

Now Kan is gaining visibility in the legal community through his “new law” venture Atrium. A group of venture capitalists led by Silicon Valley heavyweight Andreessen Horowitz just plowed $75 million into the year-old enterprise, which is split between a legal technology wing and an LLP. Former Orrick partner Augie Rakow, who advised Kan's brother's startup Cruise Automation when the autonomous vehicle company was acquired by General Motors for $1 billion, handles the law firm side.

Kan spoke with ALM about how he gained interest in the legal industry and Atrium's accomplishments in its first year of business.

You built your name in the tech industry through live streaming. How did you settle on disrupting the legal industry as your current act?

I've been an entrepreneur my entire career, since about 2005. I started a bunch of companies, but the one that people know and worked out the best was Twitch, in the live streaming space. Throughout that time I've been what I call a power user of corporate and transactional legal services. Everything we wanted to do as founders, we used lawyers to help facilitate— anything from financing to eventually M&A.

There were a lot of things that I really liked about it: I liked working with expert professionals who had a deep experience and could apply that experience to our situation. But there were a lot of things that I thought could be better. I've often felt that legal was an opaque process. To me as the buyer, I felt like it was often slow and a blocker to what we actually wanted to get done, and I felt often that the pricing was unpredictable. So when I was starting to think about new businesses to start, I thought there might be a way to improve all of those things, especially if we came at it from an innovation and tech point.

What have you accomplished in this first year as Atrium's CEO?

We've basically started to understand legal documents and turn those documents into structured data and built applications that produce useful outputs on top of that. We've built a pretty great team so far and Atrium LLP has built up a great roster list of over 250 startup clients in Silicon Valley, and helped advise on over $500 million of primary financing transactions for those clients. I think that's a lot for the first year, but we've only just gotten started.

Have any of your goals proven harder to achieve than anticipated?

Familiarizing people who come from the legal world with product and engineering development and people who come from the engineering side with the legal industry is no small feat, actually. The attorneys are coming over from advising Silicon Valley startups, so while that's close to being in the technology and product role, it's actually pretty far—further than I expected.

Just to learn from all the other disciplines and understand what everybody else does and what the timeframes are, I think that has been the biggest challenge.

Where do you hope to be in another year?

Just continue growing, continue building out the technology to be more applied for more and more different use cases. The goal with the tech side has always been, not to replace attorneys—I don't think that's possible—but to help attorneys spend more of their time on meaningful work and less of their time on crank-turning work.

Just having more and more coverage on what we can offer the legal staff is an important milestone.

Beyond a signal of the value in what you're doing at Atrium, does the investment announced the other day say anything wider about the appeal of legal industry “disruptors” to VC investors?

I think you're starting to see more and more investment in this space. Kira Systems just raised $50 million. People are seeing that legal is a massive industry: $450 billion in the U.S. and it's hardly been tackled at all. We're probably just one milestone on that road map, but I think you'll see a lot more happening in the space, definitely.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

You Might Like

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro