Line Up: nQueue Adds Customizable 'Queues' to InfoRoute 5 Release
The new functionality looks to allow users to not only control where scanned documents are going but also to pause projects between scanning and routing.
September 14, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
If you've worked in a law firm—or any type of office—for long enough, you know the key to controlling documents is flexibility. Some people like everything printed out. Some people want everything scanned. Some want to save documents in this folder or that folder or in the cloud. It can all be a bit overwhelming for IT managers.
That's the issue that nQueue is trying to solve with the release of InfoRoute 5, the latest version of the company's scanning platform. With the latest version, nQueue includes customized workflows, conveniently named “queues,” into the platform to allow users to not only control where scanned documents are going but also to pause projects between scanning and routing. InfoRoute 5 also looks to streamline the process with a leaner UI and increased back-end speed.
What It Is: InfoRoute 5 is a document-scanning platform that acts as an intermediary between hardware systems, such as a workplace scanning machine, and the eventual endpoint of a document, such as a document management system, email or more. In the middle, the platform uses optical character recognition technology to scan the document, convert into smaller file sizes and allow for quality control or routing to other parts of a workflow, if needed.
“All elements of the scanning workflow are built into InfoRoute 5,” nQueue CEO Rick Hellers told Legaltech News. “There is no need to leave the application in order to do anything, including QA [quality assurance].”
What's New: It's all about the queues. The ability to pause the workflow process aims to allow for quality assurance and document scraping as needed, as well as to create workflows for specific departments like QA or finance. The queues also can pull out data in an automated or semi-automated way as desired, as well as pull metadata outside the document to be collected for other purposes.
Hellers said the company expects QA and form filing to be the two most common uses for the queues: “Our clients have been clamoring for a QA module, and the ability to do it right at the device, before the document is routed, is a game changer, especially when you consider that workflows can be set up that QA teams to work on a set of documents or even the same document.”
The Tech Inside: InfoRoute 5's OCR capabilities are powered by the ABBYY engine that is quickly making headway in the legal tech market—Apttus, for one, also uses the tool as part of its contract management system. For nQueue, the impetus behind utilizing ABBYY is a combination of speed and control over file size.
“ABBYY helps us deliver the smallest file size, which is important, considering that many courts have file size limits. It's also extremely fast (more than one page per second) and accurate.”
Hellers estimates that using ABBYY increases the accuracy of the tool by 1 to 2 percent. “Considering that there are 2.25 million words in a typical banker's box, 1 percent more accurate reduces errors per box by—this is shocking—20,000 per box,” he said.
Wait, Aren't They a Cost Recovery Company? nQueue did indeed see its rise through cost recovery, and previous versions of the software saw cost recovery as part of the scanning workflow process. But this time, Hellers said, that's changed.
“That's one of the biggest changes. Cost recovery is now simply a part of the process. Most tools, including previous versions of InfoRoute, require the user to be logged into cost recovery, even if there is nothing to be recovered on that project. Now, cost recovery only even comes up in the specific workflows that call for it,” he explained.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250