LegalZoom Partners With Clause as Legal 'Smart Contract' Competition Heats up
The partnership, which looks to bring blockchain-enabled automatic contracting to the legal services market, was announced just days after news broke of a similar effort by competitor Rocket Lawyer.
September 17, 2018 at 01:31 PM
3 minute read
On-demand legal services company LegalZoom.com, Inc. has announced a partnership with contracting technology provider Clause Inc. by which it will offer its customers access to Clause's smart contract services. The move represents the first salvo in what is shaping up to be a race to bring smart contracts—which automatically execute their terms on the blockchain without need of intermediaries—to the legal service market.
With the new partnership, LegalZoom will allow its users to edit and sign contracts through the Clause platform, or augment LegalZoom contracts with Clause's “Smart Clauses” feature, so that such contracts can execute automatically on any blockchain.
The functionality to use Clause features within LegalZoom and vice versa, will be released as a public beta on Sept. 26.
In a statement announcing the partnership, Peter Hunn, founder of Clause, said that Clause “will augment LegalZoom's existing model with functionality that enables LegalZoom users to connect their existing business systems to contracts that are automatically executed when a milestone is achieved or a task completed.”
In the same statement, Vanessa Butnick Davis, vice president and legal managing product counsel of LegalZoom, added that the partnership “makes cutting-edge technology available to and usable by consumers and small businesses in ways previously unimaginable.”
The announcement comes just days after LegalZoom competitor Rocket Lawyer Inc. publicly disclosed it is working with blockchain developer ConsenSys to develop a smart contract service called Rocket Wallet.
However, in an email, Hunn said that the new partnership was “completely unrelated” to Rocket Lawyer's move. “This was agreed months ago, the tech has been built out in the interim.”
He added that LegalZoom and Clause agreed to work together for two reasons: “to bring Clause technology to a wider audience and for LegalZoom to offer the latest contracting technology. It's a win-win for both.”
LegalZoom's partnership with Clause comes at a time of much growth and change for the company. Like others in the on-demand legal services space, LegalZoom has looked to put its past battles with state bar associations behind it and focus on expanding its services and customer base.
For example, in June, the company partnered with nonprofit patient advocacy organization Patients Rising, which saw it expand and offer its employee benefit product for free to the organization's members.
In July, LegalZoom also announced it had closed on a $500 million investment round led by Francisco Partners and GPI Capital—one of the largest single legal technology investments to date.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250