LegalZoom Partners With Clause as Legal 'Smart Contract' Competition Heats up
The partnership, which looks to bring blockchain-enabled automatic contracting to the legal services market, was announced just days after news broke of a similar effort by competitor Rocket Lawyer.
September 17, 2018 at 01:31 PM
3 minute read
|
On-demand legal services company LegalZoom.com, Inc. has announced a partnership with contracting technology provider Clause Inc. by which it will offer its customers access to Clause's smart contract services. The move represents the first salvo in what is shaping up to be a race to bring smart contracts—which automatically execute their terms on the blockchain without need of intermediaries—to the legal service market.
With the new partnership, LegalZoom will allow its users to edit and sign contracts through the Clause platform, or augment LegalZoom contracts with Clause's “Smart Clauses” feature, so that such contracts can execute automatically on any blockchain.
The functionality to use Clause features within LegalZoom and vice versa, will be released as a public beta on Sept. 26.
In a statement announcing the partnership, Peter Hunn, founder of Clause, said that Clause “will augment LegalZoom's existing model with functionality that enables LegalZoom users to connect their existing business systems to contracts that are automatically executed when a milestone is achieved or a task completed.”
In the same statement, Vanessa Butnick Davis, vice president and legal managing product counsel of LegalZoom, added that the partnership “makes cutting-edge technology available to and usable by consumers and small businesses in ways previously unimaginable.”
The announcement comes just days after LegalZoom competitor Rocket Lawyer Inc. publicly disclosed it is working with blockchain developer ConsenSys to develop a smart contract service called Rocket Wallet.
However, in an email, Hunn said that the new partnership was “completely unrelated” to Rocket Lawyer's move. “This was agreed months ago, the tech has been built out in the interim.”
He added that LegalZoom and Clause agreed to work together for two reasons: “to bring Clause technology to a wider audience and for LegalZoom to offer the latest contracting technology. It's a win-win for both.”
LegalZoom's partnership with Clause comes at a time of much growth and change for the company. Like others in the on-demand legal services space, LegalZoom has looked to put its past battles with state bar associations behind it and focus on expanding its services and customer base.
For example, in June, the company partnered with nonprofit patient advocacy organization Patients Rising, which saw it expand and offer its employee benefit product for free to the organization's members.
In July, LegalZoom also announced it had closed on a $500 million investment round led by Francisco Partners and GPI Capital—one of the largest single legal technology investments to date.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250