Blockchain Brings Opportunities, Challenges to Legal Discovery
As more and more data is in blockchains, attorneys will have to interact with it. Blockchain will also become part of litigation without being the central focus as systems move to blockchain implementation. Attorneys will have to take note.
September 19, 2018 at 10:00 AM
7 minute read
This article appeared in Cybersecurity Law & Strategy, an ALM publication for privacy and security professionals, Chief Information Security Officers, Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Corporate Counsel, Internet and Tech Practitioners, In-House Counsel. Visit the website to learn more.
Any new technology that deals with data will eventually play a big part in discovery, and few new technologies get more attention today than blockchain.
Blockchain, made famous by bitcoin, is a digital ledger of transactions. Each entry, or block, is linked to the one before it, and is secured with cryptography. Once entered, information cannot be erased, which means it creates trust.
The societal and economic impacts of blockchain technology have the potential to be as enormous and widespread as the Internet itself. Almost six in 10 large companies are considering or are actually deploying blockchain technology, according to Juniper Research. Walmart and IBM, for instance, are using it to track food shipments to potentially help curtail food borne illnesses. South Burlington, VT, is testing it to replace the city's system for recording property transactions, The Wall Street Journal reports.
Companies are also implementing internal blockchain around such things as IT governance, privacy, supply chain logistics and assuring the authenticity of certain commodities, like luxury goods. Eventually, food supply companies may use blockchain to tell customers what food contains and how, when and where its ingredients were made or grown. Similarly, consumer goods and healthcare companies could use blockchains to reduce counterfeits and improve public trust.
Blockchain's Impact on Discovery
Blockchain technology is helping to build tools and infrastructure for the legal field, helping lawyers do such things as draft contracts, record transactions and verify legal documents.
So far, blockchain's impact on e-discovery is small, but it will grow. If electronically stored records were blockchain records, they would be self-authenticating and stored publicly (if part of a public or hybrid blockchain). That adds to their integrity. If managed in the blockchain environment, chain of custody is more readily known and easier to demonstrate. Because blockchains create redundant and persistent data and are distributed in nature, they're ideal for record keeping.
Eventually, more and more data will be in blockchains and attorneys will have to interact with it. Blockchain will also become part of litigation without being the central focus as systems move to blockchain implementation. Attorneys will have to take note.
Blockchain's Challenges and Opportunities
One big challenge blockchain creates for discovery is privacy. Because of the way blockchain works, every transaction that occurs on it becomes public and immutable, but the identity of the user making those transactions is completely private. That makes it harder to ferret out what has happened with particular activities. The structure of blockchain keeps confidential all activities reflected in the blocks. The very details of transactions, including the privacy of the digital assets and parties involved, are protected and hidden by design.
That design and level of privacy makes blockchain, “challenging for e-discovery,” says Antigone Peyton of Protorae Law. “Traditionally, we have records. We interrogate the system. We pull records and we do something with them. Blockchain is the antithesis of that. There is no interrogation of records. You understand limited things about the transactions, maybe timestamps, but that's about it.”
While blockchain increases privacy, it also increases transparency and, at a high level, will add integrity to current management systems. That's where the opportunity for discovery comes in. “From an integrity and reliability point of view, blockchain creates a more absolute truth,” says Erica G. Wilson of Vuono & Gray.
For instance, attorneys will have information in which they feel confident, such as who actually owns the note of a particular property, Peyton says. Chain of custody will be more solid because the blockchain will reveal whether a document has been manipulated, whether it is what it purports to be, and whether all data that is supposed to come with the document is actually there. These chain of custody capabilities makes blockchain work for things like title insurance. “It can prove who owns a real estate asset. That's the best use case I see,” Wilson says.
New Thinking Required
Blockchain can engender honesty and accountability to a wide range of legitimate and beneficial industries. But for anyone with criminal intent, it also makes it easier to hide their activities.
This means that lawyers need to invest in education and tools. Right now, there are very few people with the technical know-how to actually explore all of the publicly available data on the blockchain.
Attorneys will also need to think differently when it comes to discovery and blockchain is involved. “The traditional concepts relating to e-discovery just aren't applicable when we think about gathering data from the blockchain,” Peyton says.
True, the blockchain will be part of the corporate data set, but it will be stored in a different distributed manner throughout the organization. It creates efficiencies through centralized tracking and updating of systems that is democratizing access to records that normally take time and money to access. But when you try to get at data within blockchain itself, that's where complications come into play. It is not possible to understand individual activities; people will have to change their view of what's possible. Awareness and education will be a critical issue when talking to judges and juries.
Cryptocurrencies, like bitcoin, will also affect asset discovery and tracking. It is entirely possible to miss cryptocurrency assets in someone's portfolio if lawyers only ask for bank and credit card accounts. Someone can go to a bitcoin ATM, put in cash, get bitcoin and then store that asset somewhere not associated with traditional financial institutions. Attorneys may need to forensically search cellphones, computers and hard drives, maybe even houses for USB hard wallets where crypto can be stored. In a well-regarded white paper, Michael Doran explains one way litigators can find relevant evidence is to subpoena a hard drive image of the user's cryptocurrency wallet.
Increased regulation in the currency space may help improve asset tracking of crypto. In order for a user to obtain cryptocurrencies, they typically have to convert some form of fiat currency (USD, Euros, GBP, etc.) at an online exchange. This process of converting into and out of cryptocurrencies is pretty heavily regulated in most exchanges. Even international exchanges require thorough identity-verification processes. The records of these exchanges will probably play a bigger role in the discovery process.
Also, even though the most popular blockchains, such as bitcoin and ethereum, will keep a user's identity private, there are a few ways to reverse engineer a user's identity from their wallet addresses. This is part of what's driving the rise of “privacy coins” such as monero and zcash that have much more advanced privacy features to prevent this type of reverse engineering of a user's identity. The government can also get to identities by pulling information from the exchanges.
Start with Awareness
Overall, the rise of blockchain and cryptocurrency means attorneys will need to ask new and different questions — and awareness of that need is the first step. An understanding of the space and what blockchain means will help lawyers handle the challenges of blockchain and capitalize on the opportunities.
“It is like anything with e-discovery,” Peyton says. “If you don't ask the right question, you're probably not going to get a useful answer. Blockchain will add another layer of complexity.”
Adam Brill is VP, Engineering at Logikcull where he focuses on scaling the team and technology to keep up with customer demand. His specialties include creating user interfaces across all screen sizes, attracting top talent, building teams, and inspiring developers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
- 2Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
- 3Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 4Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 5A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250