Invasion of the Bots: ZentLaw Offers Bots to Streamline Help for Enterprises, Startups
ZentLaw announced the start of ZentLaw Labs and its artificial intelligence-powered 'bots' to answer startup and enterprise clients' commonly asked questions and provide legal resourcing consultation.
September 19, 2018 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
ZentLaw has announced the launch of its new innovation arm ZentLaw Labs, including the release of artificial intelligence-powered “bots” to help field startup and enterprise clients' commonly asked questions and provide legal resourcing consultation.
Monica Zent, founder of ZentLaw, said the bots won't perform any legal work but instead are purely automated response tools that will offer concise and to-the-point answers.
The firm offers two types of bots. While the enterprise bot is geared toward “helping enterprise corporate clients and legal departments to effectively resource their legal needs,” the startup bot offers answers to questions ZentLaw has encountered frequently with startup clients, Zent said.
The enterprise bot is free, but the startup bot will be a paid product. Zent said pricing hasn't been finalized for the startup bot but would be “economical,” based on a monthly subscription and cheaper than ZentLaw's currently offered solutions.
In addition to the bots, ZentLaw offers various solutions that include secondments—on-site support from a ZentLaw attorney for a short-term need of a firm or legal department, and a subscription model for clients who need ongoing legal support. Another solution, virtual counsel, offers a reduced rate structure for organizations uncertain of their specific support needs. Zent said the pricing for those solutions vary by client size and need.
ZentLaw, which was founded 17 years ago, differentiates itself as an alternative law firm by enhancing legal operations with consultations and providing technology offerings.
To be sure, ZentLaw is far from the only firm with an innovation lab, or the only developer of legal tech bots. Global law firm Dentons, for instance, launched its incubator Nextlaw Labs, and its parallel investment vehicle, Nextlaw Ventures, in 2015 What's more, in 2017 Allen & Overy announced the creation of Fuse, a space to serve as a collaborative environment for the firm's lawyers, clients and technology companies to brainstorm and develop technologies for transacting deals. complying to regulations and delivering legal services and advice.
Legaltech News has also spotlighted numerous chatbots that provide automated services, including a chatbox that aids Kentucky residents in contesting an eviction notice, and Docassemble, a tool used to create guided interviews to help walk people through complicated legal processes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250