CLOC Leaders Say Australia is Ready for Its Legal Ops Moment
After the first CLOC institute in the country, the organization's leadership says Australian companies may not quite be where their U.S. counterparts are when it comes to the maturity of their legal ops functions, but there's a lot of eagerness to learn and grow.
September 20, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The Corporate Legal Operations Consortium headed to the land down under earlier this month for the organization's first Australia institute.
What they found was a legal ops market still in its early stages, but growing fast, with in-house professionals eager for more change.
“It was an amazing event,” CLOC chief executive officer Connie Brenton told Corporate Counsel in a recent interview. “It was an amazing group of people in Australia, many of whom had not heard of legal operations prior to this.”
Brenton, who is also the senior director of legal operations for NetApp, went to the institute with a number of other CLOC leaders, including Google's head of legal operations Mary O'Carroll and Mike Haven, head of legal operations at Gap Inc. CLOC started in the U.S. about seven years ago and has since spread to other parts of the globe.
CLOC's beginnings in the U.S. have given American law departments a head start in developing legal ops functions. O'Carroll said that in contrast to U.S. events, the Australian institute focused more on the basics to lay the ground work for larger scale legal operations.
Many attendees were in-house lawyers, including GCs and CLOs, who are not dedicated solely to legal ops.
“The vast majority of companies out there either were not aware of the [legal ops] role or were stumbling around to prove its impact,” O'Carroll said. “This was a critical event in the phase of that market but will allow them, like EMEA, to leapfrog ahead.”
Haven said that while tech innovations like artificial intelligence and blockchain might be shiny and interesting, in-house leaders should answer why legal operations is important to their department and how it would work in practice first, before focusing on these innovations.
The institute still walked attendees through some technology. Haven said “fundamental technologies” such as ebilling and electronic signatures were two points of focus.
Most presenters were from the U.S. or Australia. O'Carroll said that having U.S. legal ops professionals who had already tested industry strategies and techniques was helpful because they were able to provide insight on what works and what doesn't. There are already best practices and a community in place, so legal ops professionals in the region have a guide and — importantly, according to CLOC's leaders – know that they're not alone.
“I would say it's different because when CLOC started in the U.S. we were all new to this,” O'Carroll said. “Whereas we went into Australia saying, 'Hey we've been doing this for over ten years, here are the playbooks, here's what you need to know, here's who to talk to. It was sharing and willingness to bring everyone up to the same level.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Formal Charges Filed Against Judge Accused of Helping Defendant Escape ICE Detention
- 2Top 10 Predicted Business and Human Rights Issues for 2025
- 3$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
- 4Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 5'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250