Diving In: Inside the Evolution of Law Firm Cybersecurity Practices
Cybersecurity practices used to be focused solely on post-breach legal matters. Now they've matured to point where they're comfortable handling more technical demands.
September 20, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
While cybersecurity practices have become a standard part of today's law firms, a growing number of firms are looking to stand out by offering holistic, preventive and technical services for their clients with data protection needs. Such a trend represents an evolution of law firm cybersecurity offerings, spurred in large part by client demand and a changing legal workforce.
To be sure, there are number of ways in which law firms are moving to offer these new cybersecurity services. Some, for example, are expanding their offerings through partnerships.
In September 2018, for instance, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie announced it had partnered with eosedge Legal, a cybersecurity consulting firm, in order to grow its technical cybersecurity expertise.
Kenneth Van Winkle, managing partner at Lewis Roca, said the impetus behind the partnership was the “need for an integrated law and tech approach to address cyberthreats” in today's market. He explained that clients want firms to help them be “more proactive in conjunction with cybersecurity and data breach issues as opposed to be being reactive.”
By partnering with eosedge, Lewis Roca believes it now has the “tools and ability to advise on what [clients] should be doing, and the technical expertise to know how to protect their data,” he said.
In addition to technical expertise, eosedge Legal will also be providing Lewis Roca with access to its proprietary risk management technology platform called CyberGaps, which uses a “prevention assessment methodology” to help determine a client's potential cyberrisks, said Doug DePeppe, founder of eosedge Legal.
While Lewis Roca is leveraging partnerships to grow its cybersecurity services, others have opted to start anew, banking on the belief that a novel type of cybersecurity service demands a novel type of law firm. New York-based Beckage, for example, launched in August 2018, to “bridge that gap between IT and the lawyers,” said Jennifer Beckage, the firm's founder and former Phillips Lytle partner.
A big part of that means bringing on board attorneys who are well versed in both technology and the law. While Beckage launched with five attorneys, it is still looking to grow with additional attorneys who can “take a different approach to the practice of law, in an innovative way and are not afraid to roll up their sleeves with their clients,” Beckage says.
To be sure, Beckage isn't treading into completely untrodden territory. Some firms have been ahead of the curve for years, having already combined technical and legal expertise together as a cornerstone of their cybersecurity practice, not an evolution of it.
These include Chicago-based firm Edelson, which has an in-house forensics lab that helps them understand how modern consumer technology operates and whether it violates privacy laws. Another Chicago firm, InfoLawGroup, also provides hands-on technical expertise to help clients with preventive cybersecurity due diligence matters as part of its on-demand “chief privacy officer” service.
Some in Big Law also have been offering technical, preventive risk management in their cybersecurity practices early on as well. “It is a trend now, but it's also how we've structured our practice for the last four years,” said Evan Wolff, partner at Crowell & Moring.
That others are following in the footsteps of the few before them is a testament to growing supply of cyber expertise in the legal world.
“Relatively speaking, there is a dearth of attorneys out there with technical backgrounds. But I think that is changing a bit, because there are more technical folks getting into the law,” said Jeff Poston, partner at Crowell & Moring's Washington, D.C., office.
What such cybersecurity expansions required, therefore, are a new type of attorneys who recognize that the technical security issues a client faces are not just for their IT staff. Wolff said, “we used to call these things systems problems,” but now they're business problems that are part of legal's purview.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250