Diving In: Inside the Evolution of Law Firm Cybersecurity Practices
Cybersecurity practices used to be focused solely on post-breach legal matters. Now they've matured to point where they're comfortable handling more technical demands.
September 20, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
While cybersecurity practices have become a standard part of today's law firms, a growing number of firms are looking to stand out by offering holistic, preventive and technical services for their clients with data protection needs. Such a trend represents an evolution of law firm cybersecurity offerings, spurred in large part by client demand and a changing legal workforce.
To be sure, there are number of ways in which law firms are moving to offer these new cybersecurity services. Some, for example, are expanding their offerings through partnerships.
In September 2018, for instance, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie announced it had partnered with eosedge Legal, a cybersecurity consulting firm, in order to grow its technical cybersecurity expertise.
Kenneth Van Winkle, managing partner at Lewis Roca, said the impetus behind the partnership was the “need for an integrated law and tech approach to address cyberthreats” in today's market. He explained that clients want firms to help them be “more proactive in conjunction with cybersecurity and data breach issues as opposed to be being reactive.”
By partnering with eosedge, Lewis Roca believes it now has the “tools and ability to advise on what [clients] should be doing, and the technical expertise to know how to protect their data,” he said.
In addition to technical expertise, eosedge Legal will also be providing Lewis Roca with access to its proprietary risk management technology platform called CyberGaps, which uses a “prevention assessment methodology” to help determine a client's potential cyberrisks, said Doug DePeppe, founder of eosedge Legal.
While Lewis Roca is leveraging partnerships to grow its cybersecurity services, others have opted to start anew, banking on the belief that a novel type of cybersecurity service demands a novel type of law firm. New York-based Beckage, for example, launched in August 2018, to “bridge that gap between IT and the lawyers,” said Jennifer Beckage, the firm's founder and former Phillips Lytle partner.
A big part of that means bringing on board attorneys who are well versed in both technology and the law. While Beckage launched with five attorneys, it is still looking to grow with additional attorneys who can “take a different approach to the practice of law, in an innovative way and are not afraid to roll up their sleeves with their clients,” Beckage says.
To be sure, Beckage isn't treading into completely untrodden territory. Some firms have been ahead of the curve for years, having already combined technical and legal expertise together as a cornerstone of their cybersecurity practice, not an evolution of it.
These include Chicago-based firm Edelson, which has an in-house forensics lab that helps them understand how modern consumer technology operates and whether it violates privacy laws. Another Chicago firm, InfoLawGroup, also provides hands-on technical expertise to help clients with preventive cybersecurity due diligence matters as part of its on-demand “chief privacy officer” service.
Some in Big Law also have been offering technical, preventive risk management in their cybersecurity practices early on as well. “It is a trend now, but it's also how we've structured our practice for the last four years,” said Evan Wolff, partner at Crowell & Moring.
That others are following in the footsteps of the few before them is a testament to growing supply of cyber expertise in the legal world.
“Relatively speaking, there is a dearth of attorneys out there with technical backgrounds. But I think that is changing a bit, because there are more technical folks getting into the law,” said Jeff Poston, partner at Crowell & Moring's Washington, D.C., office.
What such cybersecurity expansions required, therefore, are a new type of attorneys who recognize that the technical security issues a client faces are not just for their IT staff. Wolff said, “we used to call these things systems problems,” but now they're business problems that are part of legal's purview.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Harrisburg Jury Hands Up $1.5M Verdict to Teen Struck by Driver
- 2Former Director's Retaliation Suit Cleared to Move Forward Against Hospice Provider
- 3New York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
- 4Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
- 5Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250