E-Discovery Veteran Craig Carpenter Named CEO of X1
Carpenter says X1's position aligns well of with his vision of the e-discovery marketplace, where the goal is to 'move the strategy formation phase up to the beginning, as opposed to later in the process.'
September 20, 2018 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Craig Carpenter has seen a few things in the e-discovery industry. Most recently, he was CEO of Fronteo. Before that, he was SVP of sales with Kroll Ontrack. Then it was CMO and COO of AccessData. Plus VP of marketing and general counsel at Recommind. Add in some consulting work for companies like Relativity, and there are few people more equipped to predict the future of e-discovery.
Now, Carpenter is bringing his industry expertise to a new company: X1. Today, the software company announced that Carpenter is becoming its newest CEO, taking over for interim Tom McGovern. In the role, Carpenter will be asked to guide the company in its next phase of growth, as it looks to expand the software's applications beyond e-discovery into corporate compliance, regulatory, and other purposes.
X1's focus is on unstructured data. Originally built as a desktop search tool, the technology now focuses on e-discovery and investigations, looking to find, analyze and act on unstructured data at the end point before it moves downstream to review. Speaking with Legaltech News last week, Carpenter said X1's position aligns well of with his vision of the e-discovery marketplace, where the goal is to “move the strategy formation phase up to the beginning, as opposed to later in the process.”
He added that the standardization within X1's software was also important, saying, “Most corporate clients that I've worked with over the years look at reactive e-discovery as a very different process, totally separate from reactive regulatory compliance or proactive corporate compliance or corporate governance. And frankly, there's no reason that it should be different. You're dealing with the same information, with the same employees. Maybe you have different people doing that work, but you should have completely separate technologies and processes and systems. It just doesn't make sense.”
Carpenter said X1 became a part of his orbit while he was doing consulting work with Relativity, with whom X1 announced a product integration earlier this year. Executive chairman John Patzakis offered him a board seat at the time, but as Carpenter tells it, “I said, 'John, I'm really interested in a board seat, but I think you guys have a really big opportunity here. I'd love a bigger role.'” Little did he know, a stealth CEO search had already been underway at the company.
“The timing here is perfect, as the challenge of finding, analyzing and acting on relevant information within skyrocketing volumes of unstructured data for regulatory, litigation and corporate compliance purposes has become acute for global corporations and their outside counsel,” Patzakis said in a statement announcing the appointment. “We are ecstatic to have such a widely respected leader in charge of X1 and are confident Craig will help accelerate the strong growth X1 is experiencing.”
Now, Carpenter finds himself back in the e-discovery software world, after a few recent stints at service providers. He explained this is where he'd rather be: “Software is a great place to be. Sales cycles are longer, but it's more enjoyable. I think you can solve bigger problems, and you can engage more closely with clients in a strategic fashion, which I love to do.”
And there are plenty of problems to navigate in today's e-discovery world, such as the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), consolidation in the industry, and burgeoning data types. He said that these problems excite him, especially with lots of growth on the software side. “Investors are seeing globally a $700 billion [legal] market that is quite inefficient in most areas, and there's not that many markets of that size,” he explained.
In order to grow, Carpenter said that the first is convincing the market that X1's method of treating e-discovery as a standard business process is the way to go, something he said “should occupy us for the next two to three years, minimum.” But that's not the end goal: He sees a future where X1's unstructured data analysis can be “part of the plumbing of the bigger players in the space, whether that's Microsoft, Oracle, IBM or someone like that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 2Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 3Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 4Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 5Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250