Contract Approval Via Instant Message: PactSafe Looks to Slack, Intercom for Agreements
Looking to leverage the corporate world's growing use of instant message programs like Slack and Intercom, PactSafe moves to integrate contract processes into chat platforms.
September 24, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
In the digital age, contracts are hosted on websites and apps, and signed by a click of a button. For some, however, this just isn't seamless enough.
Contract drafting software provider PactSafe has announced the launch of “Chat-to-Sign,” a new tool it says will bring contract approvals to a new frontier: chat messaging services. Legaltech News caught up with PactSafe to discuss how contracts via instant message works and why it is needed.
What it is: Chat-to-Sign is an application that allows users to extract data from conversations in messaging platforms Slack and Intercom and transfer that information into contract templates hosted on PactSafe's contract drafting tool. Once new contracts are created using the information, Chat-to-Sign can send the agreements to recipients via Slack or Intercom, and have them “sign” the contract through the messaging apps as well.
How such signing works is “akin to the same type of experience one has accepting terms of service” for online or mobile app services, i.e. pressing a button or checking a box, said Eric Prugh, co-founder and chief product officer at PactSafe.
Why is it needed? PactSafe believes that the ability to create and execute contracts via instant messages can allow different corporate teams to send out and manage contracts in a faster, more seamless fashion.
Since Slack is increasingly used as an internal communication channel between employees in a company, Prugh said Chat-to-Sign could be leveraged by the HR department to push out initial onboarding agreements, or by legal departments to send out NDAs to specific employees.
On the other hand, since Intercom is a chat messaging platform used by companies and their customers, Prugh added that Chat-to-Sign can also be leveraged to create and send out simple sales contracts. In fact, he noted that PactSafe uses its newly launched application for just that purpose.
To be sure, the types of contracts that Chat-to-Sign is meant to handle are fairly simple, straightforward agreements. “Generally, these are what we call high-velocity contracts,” Prugh said. “It's not going to be an agreement that is overly complex.”
How it works: While PactSafe automates much of the contract drafting process, exacting data from conversations in Slack and Intercom is a somewhat manual process. Using Chat-to-Sign, a person engaged in a conversation on one of the messaging platforms must highlight the messages they want extracted. From there, they upload the information to PactSafe's contract drafting tool, and use it to draft a personalized contract that is sent back into the original chat conversation. After a recipient signs the contract, it is recorded on PactSafe's consent management tool.
Competition: To date, there is no direct competition to PactSafe's Chat-to-Sign application. But there are many other legal tech companies in the market who offer similar contract drafting solutions. Thomson Reuters' Contract Express and AbacusNext, which acquired document automation company HotDocs in late 2017, for example, are well known in the contract drafting space.
Others also offer similar solutions for different types of legal users. On-demand legal service providers Rocket Lawyer and LegalZoom have automated contracting tools for legal consumers, for instance, while Litera Microsystems launched a contract drafting tool for legal departments and law firms in early 2018.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1New York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
- 2Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
- 3Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
- 4The Week in Data Feb. 3: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 5Mass Tort Cases: Challenges for Plaintiff’s and Defense Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250