New York AG's Report on Crypto Exchanges Faces Backlash
Kraken Exchange in one tweet thanked the New York taxpayer for funding the report and said that because of it, the company was able to view some nonpublic information on its competitors. The report by the office of New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood was released last Tuesday.
September 24, 2018 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In response to the New York attorney general's report on cryptocurrency exchanges, one of the companies that was referred to the New York Department of Financial Services for further investigation lambasted the report in a series of tweets on Thursday.
Kraken Exchange in one tweet thanked the New York taxpayer for funding the report and said that because of it, the company was able to view some nonpublic information on its competitors. The report by the office of New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood was released on Tuesday.
Kraken continued on Twitter that it objected “to the highly unprofessional/malicious implication that because we did not respond to the voluntary information request we *might* be operating illegally. We told you we don't operate in NY. AG trying cases in court of public opinion now.”
Former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's Investor Protection Bureau sent letters and questionnaires in April to 13 cryptocurrency trading platforms seeking information on operational controls, money laundering and privacy practices but Kraken's CEO and co-founder refused.
The DFS has licensed bitFlyer USA, Coinbase, XRP II and Circle Internet Financial, and licensed charters to Gemini Trust and itBit Trust Co., among others. The Attorney General's Office has enforcement jurisdiction over businesses operating in New York.
When asked for a response to the criticism from the crypto exchanges, a press representative from the Attorney General's Office pointed to the report for comments. Specifically, the representative pointed to a part of the report that indicated that “the Attorney General's office investigated those claims and found that Binance, Gate.io, and Kraken all accepted trades from within New York State.”
The representative did not respond to the criticism from Kraken.
Gate.io and Binance did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Crypto exchange platform Coinbase said in a blog post that it welcomed the report and that it “shines a helpful spotlight on important compliance issues in digital asset exchange practices. However, it said media coverage of the report has been inaccurate. The company said that it does not engage in proprietary trading. The report states that “Coinbase disclosed that almost twenty percent of executed volume on its platform was attributable to its own trading.” Coinbase said, however, that has been misinterpreted and that it does not trade for the benefit of the company.
In an email, DFS Superintendent Maria T. Vullo said the department will review the New York attorney general's report.
“DFS is committed to fostering the responsible growth of the virtual currency market, while safeguarding the financial services industry and protecting consumers, through sound state regulation, including licensing and supervision. The Attorney General's report underscores the value of strong state regulation and consumer protections. We look forward to reviewing the information and referrals provided by the Attorney General,” Vullo said.
Other than citing the three companies it accused of doing little to curb manipulative trading practices, and referred to the DFS for further review, the AG's report found that there are significant gaps in investor protections in the virtual currency markets. The report was supported by voluntary answers of 10 different cryptocurrency exchanges.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250