Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution Launches in Utah as Lawyers Ponder Disruption
Online dispute resolution (ODR) for small claims court in the United States shouldn't disrupt lawyers' practices, but provide better access to people who need to settle small dollar-amount disputes, said lawyers.
September 24, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
A small claims court in a suburb outside of Salt Lake City has rolled out an online dispute resolution pilot program, and a Utah State Courts spokesperson said there are plans to extend the online program to all small claims courts statewide. Lawyers working with the project say that online dispute resolution for small claims court in the United States shouldn't disrupt lawyers' practices, but instead provide better access to people who need to settle small dollar-amount disputes.
On Sept. 19, the West Valley City Justice Court in Utah unveiled an online dispute resolution (ODR) program for its small claims court. Participants file the small claims affidavit and summons and send it to the West Valley City Justice Court. Filers will be sent an email containing a registration link, and registration must be completed no more than seven days after filing the summons and affidavit.
A defendant has 14 days after receiving the affidavit to register at the Small Claims Dispute Resolution West Valley City Justice Court web portal to settle the case. If a defendant doesn't register within 14 days, judgment may be entered against them. If the defendant isn't able to access a computer or the internet, they'll be excused from ODR and will settle the matter in a courthouse. If both parties agree to use ODR as a facilitator, a neutral trained to resolve disputes, will help the parties reach a solution.
The program took roughly two years to come to fruition. Geoffrey Fattah, Utah State Courts spokesperson, said they received feedback from mediators, judges and others on the program prior to releasing it to the public. He said the Utah State Courts is set to make the ODR portal accessible for all of Utah's small claims courts by the end of fall or by early winter.
“We are always on the lookout that we can bring justice services to the people,” Fattah added.
Brent Burningham, chair of the Utah State Bar's solo, small firm and rural practice section, said in an email that he doesn't anticipate it will have much effect on most solo practitioners or small firms, due to differences between rules in Justice Court and district court. “Rules of civil procedure applicable to small claims brought in the Justice Court allow parties, even businesses, to represent themselves. Thus, parties use attorneys less frequently in Justice Court than in district court already.”
But the Kaysville, Utah-based attorney could forsee a possible disturbance in the legal industry.
“One group of attorneys that may be more impacted than others is those that engage in high-volume debt collection on accounts with balances below the district court's jurisdictional threshold for amounts in controversy.”
However, Burningham clarified that he hadn't used the pilot program and doesn't know if it'll reduce debt collectors' workload by allowing their typical clients to bypass using an attorney in the debt collection process.
In Utah, the maximum amount awarded in small claims court is $11,000, which excludes court costs and interest.
Grace Acosta, an adjunct associate professor at the University of Ohio College of Law, said ODR shouldn't be “alien” to lawyers. She said online-based resolutions for monetary claims aren't new and cited insurance companies as an industry that already uses web-based portals to resolve monetary disagreements.
She sees the Utah program as “equaling the playing field.” On the benefits of ODR, she explained, “You don't have to go to court, you don't have to leave work, you don't have to hire an attorney.”
To be sure, ODR has been used by others outside of Utah to help streamline small claims cases. JAMS, the international arbitration and mediation company, has also zeroed in on online dispute resolution for “low to moderate value claims” by offering Endispute, a program where JAMS mediators are accessible online for a two-hour internet-based session for claims that don't surpass $100,000 for a flat fee of $500.
Modria is another online dispute resolution program that allows courts to provide “out-of-the-box resolution flows” for courts' debt, landlord/tenant and small claims matters, according to Modria's website.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
- 2Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 3With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 4Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 5Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250