Uber Agrees to Pay $148 Million to States Over Major 2016 Data Breach
The settlement is the result of a multistate investigation that found Uber paid hackers $100,000 to conceal the breach, which exposed the names, email addresses, and cellphone numbers of those users.
September 26, 2018 at 02:16 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Uber has agreed to pay a record $148 million penalty to settle allegations that it intentionally concealed a major data breach in 2016 that exposed the personal information of 57 million people, New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood's office said Wednesday.
The settlement comes in the wake of a multistate investigation that found the ride-hailing company paid hackers $100,000 to conceal the breach, which exposed the names, email addresses, and cellphone numbers of those users.
Uber did not provide public notice of the breach until a year after it happened in late 2016, according to a statement from Underwood's office.
The company's board of directors were in the dark about the ransom payment until it was discovered by a law firm last spring, the New York Attorney General's Office said. The firm was hired to investigate the company's security team in a separate matter but stumbled on the breach during its inquiry. The board then hired a forensic firm to probe what happened with the breach.
Uber said in a November 2017 statement from CEO Dara Khosrowshahi that the breach was carried out by two hackers outside the company. They accessed user data on a third-party, cloud-based service the company uses to store some information. The hackers were not able to download users' Social Security numbers, bank account information, credit card numbers, dates of birth, and trip history, according to the company.
They were able to collect the names, email addresses, and cellphone numbers of the 57 million people that use Uber. They were also able to obtain the driver's license numbers of about 600,000 drivers, according to Uber.
Uber eventually provided notice of the breach after an investigation, but that wasn't until a year after the breach and ransom payment happened. The incident caused the company to fire the two individuals that apparently led the company's response to the hack. Uber Chief Legal Officer Tony West said in a statement on Wednesday that they are working to improve safety and security after the breach and have hired new experts to implement those improvements. He said the company learned from its mistake in 2016. “Our current management team's decision to disclose the incident was not only the right thing to do, it embodies the principles by which we are running our business today: transparency, integrity, and accountability,” West said. “An important component of living up to those principles means taking responsibility for past mistakes, learning from them, and moving forward.”
The company's notice in 2017 launched a nationwide investigation into its conduct in the wake of the breach. New York is one of several states that independently investigated the breach before teaming up with other states on the probe.
The settlement is between Uber, all 50 states, and the District of Columbia. Under the agreement New York will receive $5.1 million. The agreement also requires Uber to take certain steps to improve security for its users in New York, where investigators negotiated additional terms to the settlement.
Uber has also promised to develop a new policy on data security that will assess the potential risk of another breach and implement improvements beyond what's currently in place. The company is required to hire an outside contractor to examine its security efforts regularly and recommend improvements.
Uber will also have to take additional precautions to protect any user data it stores on third-party platforms, such as the one hackers accessed in 2016. If there is another breach, employees must also have an avenue to report any ethics concerns they have about other employees. Those employees will also now be subject to stricter password guidelines to gain access to the company's internal network.
Wednesday's settlement resolves litigation around what was actually the second breach in recent years that Uber was faulted for failing to report in a timely manner, Underwood's office said. The company was also hacked in 2014 but did not provide notice until five months later in 2015. That breach exposed the names and driver's license numbers of about 50,000 Uber drivers.
Underwood said in a statement that the resolution should be seen as a warning to other companies who attempt to hide a data breach affecting users' personal information.
“This record settlement should send a clear message: we have zero tolerance for those who skirt the law and leave consumer and employee information vulnerable to exploitation,” Underwood said. “We'll continue to fight to protect New Yorkers from weak data security and criminal hackers.”
READ MORE:
State Decision Granting Uber Drivers Unemployment Could Have Wider Impact
Brooklyn Judge Denies Uber's Bid to Arbitrate Disabled Rider's Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250