Walmart's Lettuce Project a Reminder That Blockchain Is More Than Just Crypto
Walmart announced this week it is using a blockchain program to track potential foodborne illness in heads of lettuce.
September 27, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Walmart Inc. announced earlier this week that following a pilot program, it will be having its suppliers of lettuce register with a blockchain program so that the company can prevent the spread of E. coli.
The retailer will require its providers to upload data about their produce to the blockchain database, which was developed by IBM, within a year. The suppliers will be able to trace their products within seconds, according to a report in the New York Times.
The adoption of blockchain to regulate supply chains at a massive retailer underscores the growing idea that the innovative tool isn't just useful for cryptocurrency and transactions that are strictly financial. Therefore, experts say, in-house lawyers of any stripe would be smart to beef up on the emerging technology.
“As in-house or general counsel, you need to understand what 'the blockchain' is and that there are hundreds of thousands of 'blockchains' out there that all strive for the same goals, but provide different benefits, depending upon the nature of the business,” internet lawyer and blockchain lecturer Andrew Rosso said in an email.
The blockchain Walmart is using is called permissioned blockchain, according to Amir Azaran, a partner at Loeb & Loeb in Chicago. Permissioned blockchain allows the network to appoint participants who are given permission to validate each individual transaction.
“What Walmart is doing is what's called the permissioned blockchain and that to me is the future of blockchain; discreet problem solving within industry segments using permissioned blockchains,” Azaran said.
So, why use blockchain? Rosso said that two advantages are transparency and reliability through encryption. He said that now, consumers have to go through intermediaries, such as financial institutions or the post office, for example, to accomplish something.
“What this technology does is remove those intermediaries, providing an avenue for direct communication or engagement between the only parties that matter: those directly involved in the transaction,” Rosso said.
Rosso said that blockchain will give companies competitive advantages over nonadopters.
“Those businesses that are clever enough to grab hold of this tech, and utilize it for the public good, will discover its true power,” he said. “It provides the 21st century competitive advantage that has been missing since the birth of the Internet.”
In-house teams should know that even though blockchain has numerous uses—Coca-Cola recently said it will use it to track worker rights issues—it does have some downsides.
Azaran pointed out that it took awhile for Walmart and IBM to prepare their program. “This is after a two-year pilot of the technology,” he said. “It's very difficult to implement. Not technologically, but institutionally,”
He explained that companies have to create a network of participants that have some measure of control or input into the database.
There are also issues of who has access to what within the network. Azaran said there will be questions of who has the right to upload data, who has the right to view the data and who has the right to deploy smart contracts on the blockchain.
“Just doing that on a peer-to-peer network requires a lot of governance,” Azaran said. “It's not the tech, it's the governance that's needed to implement it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250