Help! I Don't Have a Data Security Assessment. Where Do I Begin?
A recent International Legal Technology Association webinar ran listeners through the process of starting a data security assessment, the importance of establishing a culture of security, and what both in-house and law firm counsel need to know.
September 28, 2018 at 05:00 AM
4 minute read
|
Increasingly for in-house counsel, it's obvious that the company needs to have its data secured. It's also become clear that law firms and third-party vendors say they're going to be secure, though in some circumstances, the promise may not reflect the reality. So what are in-house counsel to do to ensure data security?
The answer is likely conducting a data security audit of a company's law firms and third-party data holders. However, for those who haven't conducted these sort of audits before, the task can be daunting. In a poll of the audience at the “Auditing Your Litigation Support Providers” webinar conducted by the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) on Sept. 27, 40 percent of in-house counsel attendees did not know to what percentage of outside counsel they had sent security assessments.
But that's OK, said webinar panelist Ishan Girdhar, CEO of data security company Privva. He outlined seven steps to implementing a vendor risk management program for the first time:
- Create and assign team;
- Identify all vendors in the supply chain;
- Catalog vendors by criticality;
- Create the right questions based on risk and role;
- Score results and communicate with business units;
- Translate areas of risk into contract terms and conditions and update outside counsel guidelines; and
- Automate reassessment for continued compliance.
What's important, he noted, is to make sure these programs are based off a company's own risks, with their assessments tailored based on context. “What may be determined as a risk for one law firm and one corporate legal department may be different from calculating a risk score for another,” he explained.
Plus, especially when implementing a plan from the beginning, Girdhar added, implementation needs to be a collaborative process. “You don't want your vendors to think that if they answer a risk assessment in a negative fashion, they're going to lose business.”
As the lead of Walmart's Discovery Operations Group, fellow webinar panelist Amy Sellars has seen these types of assessments grow in importance. But even so, she was surprised when 79 percent of attendees said in a poll that given the hypothetical choice, they would rather hire the second-best attorney for a job where data was assured to be secure, rather than the best attorney where they could not have that assurance. “I'm pleased to see that,” she added, “because it stresses that the importance of security is rising.”
She said that many legal departments today conduct these sorts of reviews for third parties that handle data, but often, law firms may not be included in that mix, because of personal relationships, differing views on the role of law firms, or other considerations.
But law firms are perhaps the most important groups to audit, because of the nature of information they hold. When conducting her own assessments, Sellars said, her concern is the day-to-day: “At the end of the day, my concern is just the habits of people handling our matters.”
She broke this down further into four distinct buckets:
- Email and document storage habits, such as looking at privileged documents on mobile;
- Where and how they access data, like using Starbucks open Wi-Fi;
- How paper-dependent the firm is, tracking what they print out and what's happening to that paper; and
- Whether they have a security consultant.
Altogether, the goal is to have a pervasive security culture throughout an organization. “If you raise their awareness, that will have an impact on the focus they give security, the budget they give security, and their habits. If you don't care about security, they won't care about security.”
Indeed, Sellars noted that practices are not policies. The panelists on the webinar all said they had seen situations where security was promised through a particular policy, but on closer inspection, those policies were not carried out.
“Often people tell me, 'We have this policy, we have that policy.' That's great. If you don't enforce those policies, it's almost as bad as not having the policy at all,” she added.
That's why, said Tara Emory, director of consulting at Driven, it's important to go through a survey exhaustively, including physical security, personnel security, and network security in some fashion.
And it's likely that the partners will not be perfect, Emory explained, but that's not the goal of these security assessments. “It's doubtful you'll have vendors that are perfect shining stars … but you need to know if they're good enough.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Becomes 2nd State to Give Brain Waves Data Privacy Protections, With Mixed Reaction
Former FBI Cyber Expert on How AI Will Exacerbate Law Firms' Wire Transfer Vulnerabilities
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250