Judge in Coinbase Case Grapples With 'Brave New World' of Cryptocurrency
Judge Vince Chhabria struggled at times on Thursday to make sense of a lawsuit claiming that Coinbase mishandled the launch of bitcoin cash on its exchange in such a way that it damaged account holders.
September 28, 2018 at 03:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
At the beginning of a hearing in a lawsuit claiming Coinbase botched the launch of bitcoin cash trading on its cryptocurrency exchange, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria gave the lawyers on both sides something of a disclaimer.
“So this obviously is a kind of brave new world that we're discussing in this lawsuit, and it's not a world that I'm remotely familiar with,” said Chhabria, before running through the allegations in the complaint, as he understood them.
Bitcoin cash was created last year in a so-called “hard fork” of the bitcoin blockchain—the creation of a variant of the original software. According to the complaint, filed in March on behalf of Arizona resident Jeffrey Berk by Robert Green of Green & Noblin and Lynda Grant of The Grant Law Firm, Coinbase initially suggested it would not handle transactions in bitcoin cash, but later said it would begin supporting some transactions in January 2018. Coinbase abruptly changed course, opening trading on Dec. 19.
Berk, the lead plaintiff, claims that the value of bitcoin cash spiked 200 percent upon its listing on Coinbase, and the company suspended trading just minutes later. His buy order was ultimately fulfilled 20 hours later after trading resumed at $4,200.98 per unit—more than $2,000 more than the price he claims to have agreed to.
After laying out the alleged facts, Chhabria asked Green and Grant what the judge said “may be dumb questions” for someone familiar with the cryptocurrency and exchanges like Coinbase.
“How should Coinbase have done this? How should Coinbase have rolled this out? And how should Coinbase have executed this to avoid the problems that occurred?” Chhabria asked.
Grant said that there was evidence that Coinbase insiders had traded in bitcoin cash on other platforms after being informed Coinbase would support trading the cryptocurrency in the months prior to the official announcement—a move that was necessary to make technical preparations.
But Chhabria noted that the insider trading allegations weren't part of the complaint, and that the plaintiff hadn't laid out why Coinbase should have informed its users sooner about the impending bitcoin cash launch.
“Are you saying essentially that the way that Coinbase handled this rollout facilitated a pump-and-dump, that Coinbase should have known what was going to happen or did know what had happened?” Chhabria asked.
Grant said that, indeed, she was claiming that Coinbase itself might have been participating in such a scheme and making trades that profited on the losses of its customers.
“Intuitively, it seems like this is something that was bungled, but I don't know how well the complaint explains again why it was bungled and what the motivations were?” Chhabria said. “It may be because this is a new world, a new area that we judges don't know as much about as we know trading stocks at Charles Schwab.”
In Coinbase's defense, Steven Ragland of Keker, Van Nest & Peters said that the words “pump-and-dump” never appeared in the complaint, and that plaintiff's counsel were leveling all kinds of new claims inappropriately. At one point, after Grant said that she wasn't sure she understood how the implications of a regulator's investigation into the pricing of bitcoin futures might relate to Coinbase's motivations, Ragland took issue.
“If you don't understand it yourself, don't allege it yourself against my client in open court,” Ragland said. “We need to know what we're shooting at because so much has been said that's just false.”
At the conclusion of Thursday's hearing, Chhabria indicated that he's leaning toward granting Coinbase's motion to dismiss but giving the plaintiff leave to amend. He also said that he was inclined to deny Coinbase's motion to compel arbitration, but without prejudice to the company asking again later.
Read more:
Coinbase Claims Suit Over Bitcoin Cash Launch Should Be Tossed or Routed to Arbitration
Coinbase Hit With Class Action Claiming Insiders Benefited From 'Bitcoin Cash' Launch
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 2US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 3Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 4African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 5Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250