After Ringtail Sale, FTI Refocuses on Service Offerings with Kira Partnership
FTI will deploy Kira's AI technology as a standalone tool in contract review projects, as well as integrate the technology into other legal tech platforms— including its recently sold Ringtail software.
October 02, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
While FTI Consulting has sold its Ringtail e-discovery platform to Nuix, it's still looking to expand its technology offerings. In fact, it's even continuing to enhance the Ringtail platform itself.
Last week, FTI announced it entered into a partnership with AI technology provider Kira Systems in a bid to improve its client services business. Ryan Drimalla, managing director at FTI Consulting, said his company will look to harness Kira “to put our own managed service team on steroids… and to make our existing contract services bigger and better.”
He added that FTI looked to partner with Kira because its technology “gives us the ability to more accurately and more quickly analyze and interpret contracts, and also gives us some optionality around the types of services we can offer,” as the company looks to offer “more tech-focused solutions.”
With the partnership, FTI will use Kira technology as a standalone tool to deploy in contract review, as well as integrate the technology into other technology solutions. Though Kira technology will primarily be deployed in FTI's Contract Intelligence practice, which launched in 2017, Drimalla noted that FTI is also exploring “potentially using [Kira] across other FTI Consulting segments.”
Drimalla explained it is in FTI's “roadmap to integrate Kira with e-discovery review tools as well as contract management systems.” He added, “We've already successfully performed integration with the Ringtail product.”
FTI recently sold its Ringtail e-discovery platform to Nuix for $55 million. But Mike Kinnaman, senior managing director at FTI Consulting, said his company “will be licensing the Ringtail software back from Nuix, because we still serve a very large portion of the Ringtail market with our hosting and other services.”
He explained that the decision to sell Ringtail was motivated by a desire to focus more on FTI's consulting and service businesses, which he described as “technology agnostic”—meaning that FTI uses a variety of legal technologies depending on a project's or client's demands—and less on its software business.
The reason FTI was able to quickly integrate Kira with Ringtail, he added, was because Ringtail's integration capabilities and API were recently built, and FTI was already familiar with the platform.
FTI's partnership with Kira comes just weeks after the latter closed a $50 million minority investment in its first ever round of venture capital fundraising. Kira told The American Lawyer that it intends to use the funding to build out its AI technology's contract review capabilities so that it can review more contract provisions without the initial need of machine training.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
- 2Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
- 3Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 4Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 5A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250