After Ringtail Sale, FTI Refocuses on Service Offerings with Kira Partnership
FTI will deploy Kira's AI technology as a standalone tool in contract review projects, as well as integrate the technology into other legal tech platforms— including its recently sold Ringtail software.
October 02, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
While FTI Consulting has sold its Ringtail e-discovery platform to Nuix, it's still looking to expand its technology offerings. In fact, it's even continuing to enhance the Ringtail platform itself.
Last week, FTI announced it entered into a partnership with AI technology provider Kira Systems in a bid to improve its client services business. Ryan Drimalla, managing director at FTI Consulting, said his company will look to harness Kira “to put our own managed service team on steroids… and to make our existing contract services bigger and better.”
He added that FTI looked to partner with Kira because its technology “gives us the ability to more accurately and more quickly analyze and interpret contracts, and also gives us some optionality around the types of services we can offer,” as the company looks to offer “more tech-focused solutions.”
With the partnership, FTI will use Kira technology as a standalone tool to deploy in contract review, as well as integrate the technology into other technology solutions. Though Kira technology will primarily be deployed in FTI's Contract Intelligence practice, which launched in 2017, Drimalla noted that FTI is also exploring “potentially using [Kira] across other FTI Consulting segments.”
Drimalla explained it is in FTI's “roadmap to integrate Kira with e-discovery review tools as well as contract management systems.” He added, “We've already successfully performed integration with the Ringtail product.”
FTI recently sold its Ringtail e-discovery platform to Nuix for $55 million. But Mike Kinnaman, senior managing director at FTI Consulting, said his company “will be licensing the Ringtail software back from Nuix, because we still serve a very large portion of the Ringtail market with our hosting and other services.”
He explained that the decision to sell Ringtail was motivated by a desire to focus more on FTI's consulting and service businesses, which he described as “technology agnostic”—meaning that FTI uses a variety of legal technologies depending on a project's or client's demands—and less on its software business.
The reason FTI was able to quickly integrate Kira with Ringtail, he added, was because Ringtail's integration capabilities and API were recently built, and FTI was already familiar with the platform.
FTI's partnership with Kira comes just weeks after the latter closed a $50 million minority investment in its first ever round of venture capital fundraising. Kira told The American Lawyer that it intends to use the funding to build out its AI technology's contract review capabilities so that it can review more contract provisions without the initial need of machine training.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250