How Blockchain, AI Can Change the Practice of Law
Artificial intelligence and blockchain are the wave of the future for law firms, said a panel at the Clio Cloud Conference.
October 04, 2018 at 05:21 PM
3 minute read
The sixth annual Clio Cloud Conference held a talk with lawyers about how artificial intelligence and blockchain-based technologies can be used by firms of various sizes to become more cost and time efficient.
Dat Nguyen, a former Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy attorney who is now vice president of special projects at blockchain startup Sagewise, said blockchain technology can transform how lawyers verify e-signatures.
He noted that e-signatures can be difficult to authenticate because you're only given a receipt that lists an IP address and a date. That isn't secure, specifically in the legal field where contesting the accuracy of an e-signature can be costly, he added.
But using blockchain, Nguyen explained, can provide a hash at the time of signing that “mathematically proves it is unique to that document” and serves as a unique fingerprint. Document tampering and forgery could then become a thing of the past, he added.
In addition to blockchain, Casetext CEO Jake Heller noted that AI can be used in outsourcing low-level cognitive legal functions that can free up lawyers to spend more time on higher cognitive issues. Low-level work, he explained, are the manual processes that clients don't want to pay for and that can be easily automated.
Heller surmised that outsourcing some of that work to AI programs may help to lower law firm prices or provide a better way to predict how much a lawyer will charge. He cited as an example Kira, an AI-powered program that shifts through thousands of contracts for due diligence projects to find clauses that law firms view as potentially dangerous, a task that would take a lawyer much longer to find.
Heller predicted the future of law practice will be faster and more affordable and provide better outcomes for lawyers.
“If you can take certain aspects of your practice that bore you, that clients aren't paying for and that is making your practice more expensive, such as e-discovery, legal research, contract review, and use AI, you can pass [those] savings and predictability on to your clients,” he explained. “That's a big deal for clients.”
He added that since lawyers don't spend time on lower-level tasks, they can do what they are meant to do: high-level legal work. “You bring a unique amount of intelligence and intuition to every single case, that's the part you should be focused on,” he said. “Artificial intelligence allows you to focus more on that.”
A legal trends report presented by Clio found that the mass market of law firms, which are smaller than midsize and Big Law firms, could possibly automate and provide more automated lawyering as a way to reach and bill more clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1New York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
- 2Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
- 3Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
- 4The Week in Data Feb. 3: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 5Mass Tort Cases: Challenges for Plaintiff’s and Defense Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250