The 3 Phases of a Successful Legal Website Redesign
At LMA Tech Midwest, three firm and law school marketers ran through their processes for undertaking a redesign from genesis through continual improvement.
October 04, 2018 at 10:30 AM
6 minute read
Just about everybody gets their information from the internet these days, and for a lot of people searching for a law firm or law school, their first stop is the organization's website. So what face are you putting forth to the world?
For many, to keep up with the latest trends, it's a constant cycle of website redesigns. At the Legal Marketing Association's Tech Midwest conference, three firm and law school marketers ran through their processes for undertaking a redesign in “The Right Technologies and Design Tools for Best-In-Class Websites” session. The process may be long and arduous. But by following a thoughtful process, the end result can be extremely rewarding.
1. Where are we now, and what do we want?
To get a website redesign off the ground, it takes a good deal of planning, perhaps more than some legal marketers that haven't gone through a redesign may be expecting. The first phase of the process requires looking at the preferred scope of the redesign, the current state of the website, and stakeholder and user research.
In analyzing the current state of the website, Cynthia Anne McCollough, senior digital strategist at the University of Michigan Law School, said it's important to perform an analytics review with tools such as Google Analytics and Crazy Egg, as well as a performance review with tools such as Siteimprove and GTmetrix. By establishing that baseline, she added, firms and others can make sure that the redesign has the required effect. For those doing a lot of the redesign work in-house, she also noted to look for accessibility issues (using Ally.js or Axe) or compliance issues (following World Wide Web Consortium rules).
A brand audit, using a tool such as Yext, is also crucial during this stage to make sure that web search sites such as Google, Yahoo, and even Yelp have the correct mailing and phone information. This search can also be a good opportunity to analyze competitors, even down to minute decisions such as color palette, the visual approach of the page, and typeface. There even exists tools such as WhatCMS.org to determine what content management systems competitors use.
“A lot of this stuff is really just grunt work,” McCullough explained. “Whatever our presence is on the website, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, you need to take a look at that.”
But, of course, all of this research requires communication, as well as buy in from the top, especially because budgets are not infinite. “You need to have agreement with whoever the decision makers are, the champions of the website, what is worth having, and what is just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic,” McCollough said.
2. Now we know what we want, let's make it happen.
Now you have the background research. But it takes more work to turn these goals into reality in the second phase of the redesign.
Paul Bonner, director of marketing at Venable, said this stage begins with website vendors. This includes not only the actual technology and design staff, but writers, photographers, videographers, and more.
One important consideration, he said, is, “Are you just going to have your current vendors redo it?” If not, then the firm may need to go through an RFP process that looks for talent, technology and tools, process, location, and even personality fit and understanding of the legal market.
“There are key things about a law firm website that a vendor must know, so I made sure not to include those questions. … I used the RFP not only to get information, but also as a preliminary test for screening,” Bonner explained. McCollough agreed with this point, noting that she intentionally left questions and market analysis out of her RFPs, then looked to see whether vendors would include them in their audience analysis.
From there, it's a matter of project management and collaboration. That doesn't mean micromanaging, though. “We demanded what we needed in the project plan and the updates, but we put the heavy lifting on them,” Bonner said.
For Bonner, CMS selection in particular was a function of flexibility, usability, portability and security, among other normal considerations such as cost. Search engine selection, meanwhile, focused on relevancy, flexibility, and price. And, of course, there needs to be a focus on different design priorities such as digital-first, mobile-first or accessibility.
Once again, it's a lot of decision-making, and Bonner said Venable went through numerous storyboards and potential templates to get to a final result in its most recent redesign. In doing so, though, it established a new brand and tone for the entire firm that proved invaluable.
3. Manage it, measure it, and continue to improve.
You may have a new website, but the work doesn't stop here. The final phase is constant vigilance and improvement.
“Launching a website is a lot of work, and the best advice we can all give you is to be organized,” said Jacqueline Madarang, senior marketing technology manager at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings.
For starters, this is where analytics dashboards come back into play. Madarang suggested to let tools such as Siteimprove and Google Analytics crawl the website during development and initial launch, to track both potential issues, as well as to identify early on user journeys.
She noted that she gets reports to sent to her on a regular basis, and typically, the more visual, the better. Having three to five highlights prominent on the report can also help explain the analytics to others within the firm, even if it doesn't have the full summary including heat maps, budgets, and more. Also included on Madarang's full report is a one-page glossary at the end, to explain such phrases as “KPIs,” “bounce rate” and more.
Even though marketing managers may not be managing the IT back end, Madarang also said that it's important to set up alerts about a website's performance to measure page load time, broken links, user journey and, of course, if the website goes down. “Google found that a half second delay was enough to annoy users, and turn 20 percent of Google users away,” she noted.
And of course, it's important to keep increasing personalization and enhancements to the website. “I highly encourage you to have some sort of strategy after you launch the site when it comes to enhancements,” Madarang said. At Bradley, Madarang and her colleagues are planning monthly or quarterly meetings to look at new ways to improve the site, such as recent improvements like a pro bono white paper callout and a drop-down for firm blogs.
In her opinion, this is necessary. As Madarang said, “It doesn't matter whether it's your first phase, or your second phase, or your 35th phase. You need to continually find ways to improve.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250