Legal Innovation Comes From Tech Partnerships, But They Don't Happen Easily
If law firms collaborate with tech companies to combine lawyers' skills with tech companies' capital and tech expertise, the legal industry can flourish and increase profitability, said a panelist at this year's Clio Cloud Conference.
October 08, 2018 at 11:33 AM
3 minute read
Patrick Palace is a lawyer who doesn't code or know how to create a bot. But he can leverage his experience and knowledge to combine legal and tech expertise.
“This is our time to build the projects to create the system that really has all the answers instead of tinkering and tinkering,” said Palace, owner of Tacoma, Washington-based Palace Law, at the the Clio Cloud Conference's “Building Partnerships Between Law Firms & Tech Companies” session.
Palace noted that there are barriers to fusing the legal and tech industries completely. Rule 5.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits firms from sharing legal fees with nonlawyers and practicing law with nonlawyers, and the rule may create more hoops lawyers have to jump through to collaborate with tech companies, he said.
But he added there are still ethical ways lawyers can work with tech experts to create innovative tools.
He cited examples of a law firm contracting with a tech company to work on a tool, or a firm becoming a joint developer who doesn't share fees but shares ideas. Attorneys can also start companies outside of the law firm and create a joint venture for a limited purpose, he said.
In fact, Palace's small firm collaborated with tech companies in many of these ways to develop tools to increase their revenue.
He noted that tech company MetaJure helped his firm quickly gather and organize its lengthy discovery process. The firm also joined forces with Coral Docs to produce a chatbot to quickly assess if a prospective client has a claim worth pursuing. Additionally, Palace's firm teamed up with a tech company to create a case value calculator, and partnered with Suffolk University Law School to develop an algorithm based on 14 months of data to deduce the statistical probability of winning a case.
The tech companies the firm worked with all sold their programs to other clients. But while Palace's firm didn't share in those profits, it did see an uptick in revenue from using those programs practically for free.
“Everything we did wasn't expensive,” he said. “Everything we did anyone in this room could do. I'd like to think if all of us felt empowered to do these things, we could really take a crushing blow to the access-to-justice gap, and we could make a lot more money than we are already making.”
Indeed, Palace believes the current law firm model is being left behind by a burgeoning legal industry funded by nonlawyers and tech experts.
“We don't know how to get outside to the experts who do all the cool things that other companies can do like LegalZoom, Rocket Lawyer. No one is putting them in a silo. They get to raise $500 million, they get to partner with anyone they want, they get to create these amazing tools and platforms that the entire country can use for $79.99. And where are we?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250