Legal Innovation Comes From Tech Partnerships, But They Don't Happen Easily
If law firms collaborate with tech companies to combine lawyers' skills with tech companies' capital and tech expertise, the legal industry can flourish and increase profitability, said a panelist at this year's Clio Cloud Conference.
October 08, 2018 at 11:33 AM
3 minute read
Patrick Palace is a lawyer who doesn't code or know how to create a bot. But he can leverage his experience and knowledge to combine legal and tech expertise.
“This is our time to build the projects to create the system that really has all the answers instead of tinkering and tinkering,” said Palace, owner of Tacoma, Washington-based Palace Law, at the the Clio Cloud Conference's “Building Partnerships Between Law Firms & Tech Companies” session.
Palace noted that there are barriers to fusing the legal and tech industries completely. Rule 5.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits firms from sharing legal fees with nonlawyers and practicing law with nonlawyers, and the rule may create more hoops lawyers have to jump through to collaborate with tech companies, he said.
But he added there are still ethical ways lawyers can work with tech experts to create innovative tools.
He cited examples of a law firm contracting with a tech company to work on a tool, or a firm becoming a joint developer who doesn't share fees but shares ideas. Attorneys can also start companies outside of the law firm and create a joint venture for a limited purpose, he said.
In fact, Palace's small firm collaborated with tech companies in many of these ways to develop tools to increase their revenue.
He noted that tech company MetaJure helped his firm quickly gather and organize its lengthy discovery process. The firm also joined forces with Coral Docs to produce a chatbot to quickly assess if a prospective client has a claim worth pursuing. Additionally, Palace's firm teamed up with a tech company to create a case value calculator, and partnered with Suffolk University Law School to develop an algorithm based on 14 months of data to deduce the statistical probability of winning a case.
The tech companies the firm worked with all sold their programs to other clients. But while Palace's firm didn't share in those profits, it did see an uptick in revenue from using those programs practically for free.
“Everything we did wasn't expensive,” he said. “Everything we did anyone in this room could do. I'd like to think if all of us felt empowered to do these things, we could really take a crushing blow to the access-to-justice gap, and we could make a lot more money than we are already making.”
Indeed, Palace believes the current law firm model is being left behind by a burgeoning legal industry funded by nonlawyers and tech experts.
“We don't know how to get outside to the experts who do all the cool things that other companies can do like LegalZoom, Rocket Lawyer. No one is putting them in a silo. They get to raise $500 million, they get to partner with anyone they want, they get to create these amazing tools and platforms that the entire country can use for $79.99. And where are we?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 2Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firms Innovator Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 3Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 4'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
- 5Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250