Siri Can Record Police Officers, But Is It Legal? It Depends
With the help of a new app called 'Police,' Siri can trigger the video function on an iPhone and record traffic stops.
October 11, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Siri probably isn't the all-knowing, all-seeing entity you're used to invoking when you catch the sight of police lights flashing in the rearview mirror—but she is listening. “Police” is a new addition to the Apple “Shortcuts” repertoire that allows users to discreetly record encounters with law enforcement officers during traffic stops.
The obvious question is “how legal is that?” And the answer is a resounding “it depends”—on which state you're driving through or whether or not the officer was entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy. Jarno Vanto, a shareholder at Polsinelli, thinks that if the stop happened on a crowded road in plain view of the dozens of cars passing by, then those expectations should probably be kept in check. The same goes if the officer is wearing a bodycam of their own.
“All of these laws that are built around the concept that certain environments and certain circumstances have an expectation of privacy; they don't specifically carve out law enforcement officers from the scope of those laws. But when a law enforcement officer is carrying out his or her public duty to enforce the law, there's a limited expectation of privacy,” Vanto said.
Here's how it all works: “Shortcuts” is a customizable feature that allows users to trigger the functions of multiple apps with the touch of a button or by appealing directly to Siri. Apple uses the example of a “Surf Time” command that would simultaneously pull up a surf report, give an ETA to the beach and launch whatever playlist gets you in the mood to spend two-and-a-half hours pulling sand out of your shorts.
A man named Robert Petersen developed a Shortcut (aptly dubbed “Police”) that eschews tide levels in favor of a sequence that begins with something along the lines of “Siri, I'm getting pulled over.” Any music that's playing gets turned down along with screen brightness. The iPhone is put into “Do Not Disturb” mode and a text message lets a pre-arranged contact know that you're getting pulled over along with the latitude and longitude of the stop.
If coordinates don't paint a picture, the video—which the phone will automatically begin recording—should. “Police” can then send the finished video to another contact or upload it to a digital storage entity like Dropbox, the relative security of which could create potential gaps in the chain of evidence and raise complications if an incident were to wind up in court.
Vanto compared it to the cameras the officers wear on duty and the measures in place to make sure that they can't tamper with the footage.
“Similar care isn't taken for these recordings through the app or the software that enables multiple apps in unison, so there any number of things that could happen or reasonably be argued that someone could easily hack into wherever it goes before it gets shared. There might be issues around whether that's the actual footage or someone's done something to it,” Vanto said.
He sees “Police” and other apps based on automated sequencing systems as something to be considered beyond the recording of law enforcement. An iPhone isn't really getting any footage that couldn't be shot with a dashboard cam, after all. Vanto said that Apple has traditionally been very conservative about people doing anything with its iOS, but Shortcuts opens up all kinds of possibilities that be triggered with a single “Siri.”
“It's easy to forget that there are legal implications to those actions,” Vanto said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250