Siri Can Record Police Officers, But Is It Legal? It Depends
With the help of a new app called 'Police,' Siri can trigger the video function on an iPhone and record traffic stops.
October 11, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Siri probably isn't the all-knowing, all-seeing entity you're used to invoking when you catch the sight of police lights flashing in the rearview mirror—but she is listening. “Police” is a new addition to the Apple “Shortcuts” repertoire that allows users to discreetly record encounters with law enforcement officers during traffic stops.
The obvious question is “how legal is that?” And the answer is a resounding “it depends”—on which state you're driving through or whether or not the officer was entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy. Jarno Vanto, a shareholder at Polsinelli, thinks that if the stop happened on a crowded road in plain view of the dozens of cars passing by, then those expectations should probably be kept in check. The same goes if the officer is wearing a bodycam of their own.
“All of these laws that are built around the concept that certain environments and certain circumstances have an expectation of privacy; they don't specifically carve out law enforcement officers from the scope of those laws. But when a law enforcement officer is carrying out his or her public duty to enforce the law, there's a limited expectation of privacy,” Vanto said.
Here's how it all works: “Shortcuts” is a customizable feature that allows users to trigger the functions of multiple apps with the touch of a button or by appealing directly to Siri. Apple uses the example of a “Surf Time” command that would simultaneously pull up a surf report, give an ETA to the beach and launch whatever playlist gets you in the mood to spend two-and-a-half hours pulling sand out of your shorts.
A man named Robert Petersen developed a Shortcut (aptly dubbed “Police”) that eschews tide levels in favor of a sequence that begins with something along the lines of “Siri, I'm getting pulled over.” Any music that's playing gets turned down along with screen brightness. The iPhone is put into “Do Not Disturb” mode and a text message lets a pre-arranged contact know that you're getting pulled over along with the latitude and longitude of the stop.
If coordinates don't paint a picture, the video—which the phone will automatically begin recording—should. “Police” can then send the finished video to another contact or upload it to a digital storage entity like Dropbox, the relative security of which could create potential gaps in the chain of evidence and raise complications if an incident were to wind up in court.
Vanto compared it to the cameras the officers wear on duty and the measures in place to make sure that they can't tamper with the footage.
“Similar care isn't taken for these recordings through the app or the software that enables multiple apps in unison, so there any number of things that could happen or reasonably be argued that someone could easily hack into wherever it goes before it gets shared. There might be issues around whether that's the actual footage or someone's done something to it,” Vanto said.
He sees “Police” and other apps based on automated sequencing systems as something to be considered beyond the recording of law enforcement. An iPhone isn't really getting any footage that couldn't be shot with a dashboard cam, after all. Vanto said that Apple has traditionally been very conservative about people doing anything with its iOS, but Shortcuts opens up all kinds of possibilities that be triggered with a single “Siri.”
“It's easy to forget that there are legal implications to those actions,” Vanto said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
- 2‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
- 3LinkedIn Accused of Sharing LinkedIn Learning Video Data With Meta
- 4Delaware Supreme Court Agrees Insurance Dispute Can Be Retried
- 5New Strategies For Estate, Legacy Planning
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250